The Effect of Intermittent and Continuous Feeding on Growth and Discharge Time in Very Low Birth Weight Preterm
Melek Selalmaz1, Gulzade Uysal2, Umut Zubarioglu1
1Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Teaching and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Insights
Continuous and intermittent bolus feeding show no significant differences in growth or discharge times for very low birth weight infants. However, necrotizing enterocolitis developed earlier with intermittent feeding.
Area of Science:
- Neonatalogy
- Pediatric Nutrition
- Clinical Research
Background:
- Optimizing feeding strategies for very low birth weight (VLBW) infants is crucial for their development and hospital outcomes.
- Intermittent bolus feeding and continuous feeding are two common methods, each with potential benefits and drawbacks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effects of intermittent bolus feeding versus continuous feeding on early growth and hospital discharge timing in VLBW infants.
- To assess the incidence and timing of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in VLBW infants under different feeding regimens.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, randomized, controlled study involving 80 VLBW infants (birth weight <1500 g).
- Infants were randomized to receive either intermittent bolus feeding or continuous feeding.
- Key outcomes including growth parameters, time to reach birth weight, feeding tolerance, mechanical ventilation duration, and NEC development were compared.
Main Results:
- No statistically significant differences were observed in gender, gestational age, birth weight, height, head circumference, time to regain birth weight, maximum weight loss, parenteral feeding duration, or time to full enteral/oral feeding between the groups.
- Hospitalization time in the intensive care unit and duration of mechanical ventilation were also comparable.
- While not statistically significant, Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) Stage I and II developed in 34.1% of the continuous feeding group and 28.2% of the intermittent group, with onset occurring earlier in the intermittent group (2.8 days vs. 4.5 days).
Conclusions:
- Neither continuous nor intermittent bolus feeding significantly impacted growth parameters or discharge times in VLBW infants.
- Although NEC development rates were similar, the intermittent bolus feeding model was associated with an earlier onset of NEC.
Objectives:
The aim of this study was to determine the effect of intermittent bolus feeding and continuous feeding models on early growth and discharge time in very low birth weight infants.
Methods:
The study was designed as a prospective, randomized, and controlled study. Infants born in our hospital with birth weight below 1500 g within a 1 year period were included in the study. The number of samples was determined by power analysis. Babies were randomized according to birth weight and fed with intermittent bolus feeding and continuous feeding models. Demographic characteristics, clinical findings, diagnosis, nutritional status, and length of hospital stay were compared.
Results:
The study was conducted with 80 preterm infants, which consisted of continuous feeding (n=41) and intermittent bolus feeding (n=39). There was no significant difference in gender, gestational week, birth weight, height, and head circumference distribution of the babies between groups. The difference between the reach time to birth weight and maximum weight loss rates, parenteral feeding time, transition time to full enteral feeding, transition time to oral feeding, development of feeding intolerance, mechanical ventilation time, and hospitalization time in intensive care unit were not statistically significant. Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) Stage I and II developed in 34.1% of babies fed with continuous feeding model and 28.2% of babies fed intermittently; NEC was detected to start in 4.5±2.8 days in the continuous feeding group and in 2.8±5.2 days in the intermittent group. These differences were found to be insignificant between the two groups (p=0.634 and p=0.266, respectively).
Conclusion:
There was no difference between growth parameters and discharge time of preterm babies who were applied continuous and intermittent bolus feeding model. Although there was no statistically significant difference on the development of NEC, it was determined that NEC developed earlier in the intermittent bolus feeding model.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Drug Accumulation During Multiple Dosing: Intermittent IV Infusions
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion


