Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 7, 2025
11:08
Exploring the Effects of Spaceflight on Mouse Physiology using the Open Access NASA GeneLab Platform
Published on: January 13, 2019
12.6K
Defining Success in Open Science [version 2; peer review:2 approved].
Sarah E Ali-Khan1,2, Antoine Jean1, Emily MacDonald1
1Faculty of Law, Centre for Intellectual Property Policy (CIPP), McGill University, 3644 Rue Peel, Montreal, H3A 1W9, Canada.
MNI Open Research
|May 3, 2021
Summary
Open Science collaboration (OS) offers a promising path to address unsustainable innovation and inequities. Experts convened to define successful OS outcomes for research, innovation, and social impact, aiming to develop evaluation tools.
Area of Science:
- Life Sciences
- Innovation Systems
- Public Health
Background:
- Growing concerns regarding unsustainable innovation systems and inequities in science.
- Urgent global need to spur innovation and ensure equitable benefit distribution.
- Open Science collaboration (OS) is recognized as a key strategy to address these challenges.
Purpose of the Study:
- To gather expert perspectives on the desired outcomes of successful Open Science.
- To inform policy development for the adoption and implementation of OS.
- To identify key indicators for assessing the impact of OS in life sciences.
Main Methods:
- Convening an international Open Science Leadership Forum with diverse stakeholders.
- Facilitating discussions on successful OS outcomes, policy, and implementation.
- Summarizing delegate views on OS contributions to research, innovation, and social impact.
Main Results:
- Delegates shared views on what constitutes successful Open Science in life sciences.
- Identified key areas for OS to deliver research, innovation, and social impact.
- Initiated a process to develop a toolkit of indicators for OS assessment.
Conclusions:
- Open Science collaboration holds significant potential for advancing research, innovation, and social benefit.
- Developing robust evidence and assessment tools is crucial for widespread OS adoption.
- The ultimate goal is to empower stakeholders to optimize innovation ecosystems for public and patient value.
Related Concept Videos
01:30Scientific Nature of Social Psychology
299
Social psychology is a scientific discipline dedicated to understanding how individuals think, feel, and behave in social contexts. Unlike common sense, which relies on anecdotal experiences and intuition, social psychology employs systematic research and empirical methods to ensure objectivity and reliability. This distinction is fundamental in distinguishing scientifically supported findings from mere speculation.Four fundamental scientific values guide a structured approach to research in...
299
01:11Guidelines for Writing Outcome
3.4K
When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
3.4K
03:50The Scientific Method
62.7K
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion.
62.7K
01:32The Scientific Method
253.3K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
253.3K
02:40The Scientific Method
64.0K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
64.0K
01:23Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
220
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
220