Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 7, 2025
Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
Published on: January 29, 2018
Rethinking Greulich and Pyle: A Deep Learning Approach to Pediatric Bone Age Assessment Using Pediatric Trauma Hand
Ian Pan1, Grayson L Baird1, Simukayi Mutasa1
1Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital/Hasbro Children's Hospital, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 593 Eddy St, Providence, RI 02903 (I.P., D.W.S., R.S.A.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Lifespan Biostatistics Core, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI (G.L.B.); Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (S.M., C.R.); and Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Florida Shands Hospital, Gainesville, Fla (D.M.).
Purpose:
To develop a deep learning approach to bone age assessment based on a training set of developmentally normal pediatric hand radiographs and to compare this approach with automated and manual bone age assessment methods based on Greulich and Pyle (GP).
Methods:
In this retrospective study, a convolutional neural network (trauma hand radiograph-trained deep learning bone age assessment method [TDL-BAAM]) was trained on 15 129 frontal view pediatric trauma hand radiographs obtained between December 14, 2009, and May 31, 2017, from Children's Hospital of New York, to predict chronological age. A total of 214 trauma hand radiographs from Hasbro Children's Hospital were used as an independent test set. The test set was rated by the TDL-BAAM model as well as a GP-based deep learning model (GPDL-BAAM) and two pediatric radiologists (radiologists 1 and 2) using the GP method. All ratings were compared with chronological age using mean absolute error (MAE), and standard concordance analyses were performed.
Results:
The MAE of the TDL-BAAM model was 11.1 months, compared with 12.9 months for GPDL-BAAM (P = .0005), 14.6 months for radiologist 1 (P < .0001), and 16.0 for radiologist 2 (P < .0001). For TDL-BAAM, 95.3% of predictions were within 24 months of chronological age compared with 91.6% for GPDL-BAAM (P = .096), 86.0% for radiologist 1 (P < .0001), and 84.6% for radiologist 2 (P < .0001). Concordance was high between all methods and chronological age (intraclass coefficient > 0.93). Deep learning models demonstrated a systematic bias with a tendency to overpredict age for younger children versus radiologists who showed a consistent mean bias.
Conclusion:
A deep learning model trained on pediatric trauma hand radiographs is on par with automated and manual GP-based methods for bone age assessment and provides a foundation for developing population-specific deep learning algorithms for bone age assessment in modern pediatric populations.Supplemental material is available for this article.© RSNA, 2020See also the commentary by Halabi in this issue.
More Related Videos
08:39Longitudinal Micro-Computed Tomography Image Analysis for User-Defined Region of Interest in Critical-Sized Bone Defects
Published on: June 24, 2025
07:29Author Spotlight: Advanced Techniques for Characterizing Tissue Mineralization in Bone Regeneration Research
Published on: September 27, 2024
Related Concept Videos
01:09Changes in the Appendicular Skeleton with Age
Initially, the limb buds consist of a core of mesenchyme covered by a layer of ectoderm. The ectoderm at the end of the limb bud thickens to form a narrow crest called the apical ectodermal ridge. This ridge stimulates the underlying...
01:18Classification of Bones
Long and Short Bones
The appendicular skeleton, particularly the upper and lower limbs, is primarily made of long and short bones. The...
01:40Bone Remodeling