How should we theorize about justice in the genomic era?

Area of Science:

• Bioethics
• Genomic Medicine
• Social Justice Theory

Background:

• Rapid advancements in genomics, gene therapy, and genetic editing define the "genetic revolution."
• Existing theories of justice may not adequately address novel ethical and social issues arising from genomic technologies.

Purpose of the Study:

• To propose a methodological framework for theorizing justice in the genomic era.
• To examine how genomic advancements could exacerbate or mitigate social inequalities.

Main Methods:

• Utilizing the methodology of non-ideal theory.
• Analyzing potential impacts on genetic discrimination, disability rights, gender equality, and disease risk.

Main Results:

• Theorizing justice requires addressing new inequalities like genetic discrimination and disability-related injustices.
• Genomic technologies offer potential to mitigate disease risks and improve public health.

Conclusions:

• A comprehensive theory of justice must consider both the risks and benefits of the genetic revolution.
• Ensuring justice in the genomic era necessitates attention to individual rights, equality, and population health benefits.