Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 6, 2025

Modifying the Bank Erosion Hazard Index BEHI Protocol for Rapid Assessment of Streambank Erosion in Northeastern Ohio
Published on: February 13, 2015
Modification of the Priority Risk Index: Adapting to Emergency Management Accreditation Program standards for
Joseph B Harris1, Geoffrey Bartlett2, T Andrew Joyner3
1Department of Criminology & Criminal Justice, Western Carolina University, Cullowhee, North Carolina; Department of Geosciences, Geoinfor-matics and Disaster Science Lab, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4774-5355.
Abstract:
The Priority Risk Index is increasingly used as a methodology for quantifying jurisdictional risk for hazard mitigation planning purposes, and it can evolve to meet specific community needs. The index incorporates probability, impact, spatial extent, warning time, and duration when assessing each hazard, but it does not explicitly integrate a vulnerability and consequence analysis into its final scoring. To address this gap, a new index was developed-the Enhanced Priority Risk Index (EPRI). The new index adds a sixth category, vulnerability, calculated from a vulnerability and consequence analysis of the impacts on seven sectors identified in Standard 4.1.2 of the Emergency Management Accreditation Program (EMAP). To obtain a vulnerability score, impacts are ranked by sector from low (1) to very high (4), then a weighting factor is applied to each sector. The vulnerability score is added to the EPRI and provides risk levels based on the number of exploitable weaknesses and countermeasures identified within a specific jurisdiction. The vulnerability score and resulting EPRI are scalable and can be applied across jurisdictions, providing a transferable methodology that improves the hazard identification and risk assessment process and provides an approach for meeting EMAP accreditation standards.
More Related Videos
11:18Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
Published on: September 12, 2014
05:16Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Hazard Rate
Applications of GIS: Disaster Management and Emergency Response
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Planning Nursing Care I