Evaluation of the effect of apixaban using a viscoelastic coagulation assay with Russell's viper venom reagent

Kaoru Suzuki1, Nobuyuki Katori2, Yoshihiro Kimura1

  • 1Department of Anesthesiology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishishinbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan.

Abstract

Insights

The Russell viper venom (RVV) test effectively monitored apixaban (a direct oral anticoagulant) levels during spine surgery. This point-of-care test showed promise for perioperative anticoagulation management.

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacology and Toxicology
  • Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Surgical Anesthesiology

Background:

  • Conventional coagulation tests (prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time) lack sensitivity to direct oral anticoagulants like apixaban.
  • Effective perioperative anticoagulation management is crucial for patients undergoing major surgery, such as posterior spine fusion.
  • Apixaban is a commonly prescribed anticoagulant requiring reliable monitoring methods, especially around surgical procedures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the utility of the Russell viper venom (RVV) test for monitoring the antithrombotic effect of apixaban.
  • To assess apixaban's anticoagulant activity in a patient undergoing posterior spine fusion surgery using point-of-care testing.

Main Methods:

  • A case study involving an 84-year-old male patient scheduled for percutaneous posterior spine fusion.
  • Apixaban administration was managed perioperatively (discontinued before surgery, resumed after).
  • Point-of-care monitoring included the RVV test, chromogenic anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) activity, prothrombin time, and activated partial thromboplastin time.

Main Results:

  • The RVV test demonstrated prolonged clotting times that correlated with apixaban's anti-Xa activity.
  • Apixaban levels, as indicated by the RVV test and anti-Xa activity, were within the therapeutic range during the surgical procedure.
  • Conventional coagulation tests did not adequately reflect the degree of anticoagulation by apixaban.

Conclusions:

  • The Russell viper venom (RVV) test shows potential as a valuable point-of-care assay for estimating apixaban's anti-Xa levels.
  • This method could aid in managing apixaban during the perioperative period, ensuring adequate anticoagulation and minimizing bleeding risk.
  • Further studies are warranted to validate the RVV test's role in routine clinical practice for apixaban monitoring.