Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Spontaneous closure of partial maxillectomy defects using an acrylic removable partial dental prosthesis: A case series.

Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists·2026
Same author

Bony Union in Maxilla and Mandible Free Flap Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Head & neck·2026
Same author

Tracheostomy in Flap-Based Head and Neck Cancer Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Indications and Adverse Outcomes.

Head & neck·2025
Same author

Characterizing volatile organic compound profiles in oral cancer using multiple sample collection approaches by GC-IMS and TD-GC-MS.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Machine Learning to Predict Extranodal Extension in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The Laryngoscope·2025
Same author

Information Needs of Patients With Head and Neck Cancer and Their Supports in Relation to Treatment Management Choices: Scoping Review.

JMIR cancer·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 6, 2025

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

6.7K

Maxillectomy defects: Virtually comparing fibular and scapular free flap reconstructions.

Sally Nguyen1, Khanh Linh Tran1, Edward Wang1

  • 1Division of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Head & Neck
|May 7, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Patient-specific fibular and scapular reconstructions offer distinct advantages for maxillectomy defects. Virtual analysis guides reconstruction choice based on defect type and patient goals.

Keywords:
free flaphead and neck cancermicrovascular reconstructionosseous flapvirtual planning

More Related Videos

Designing CAD/CAM Surgical Guides for Maxillary Reconstruction Using an In-house Approach
08:01

Designing CAD/CAM Surgical Guides for Maxillary Reconstruction Using an In-house Approach

Published on: August 24, 2018

9.2K
A Reliable Porcine Fascio-Cutaneous Flap Model for Vascularized Composite Allografts Bioengineering Studies
05:34

A Reliable Porcine Fascio-Cutaneous Flap Model for Vascularized Composite Allografts Bioengineering Studies

Published on: March 31, 2022

2.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 6, 2025

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

6.7K
Designing CAD/CAM Surgical Guides for Maxillary Reconstruction Using an In-house Approach
08:01

Designing CAD/CAM Surgical Guides for Maxillary Reconstruction Using an In-house Approach

Published on: August 24, 2018

9.2K
A Reliable Porcine Fascio-Cutaneous Flap Model for Vascularized Composite Allografts Bioengineering Studies
05:34

A Reliable Porcine Fascio-Cutaneous Flap Model for Vascularized Composite Allografts Bioengineering Studies

Published on: March 31, 2022

2.5K

Area of Science:

  • Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  • Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Maxillectomy defects present complex reconstructive challenges.
  • Patient-specific fibular and scapular free flaps are utilized in reconstruction.
  • Virtual surgical planning aids in optimizing reconstructive outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To virtually compare patient-specific fibular and scapular reconstructions for maxillectomy defects.
  • To evaluate reconstructions based on midface cephalometrics, dental implantability, and pedicle length.
  • To guide reconstructive strategy based on defect characteristics.

Main Methods:

  • Virtual creation of nine maxillectomy defects on ten maxillas.
  • Virtual reconstruction using patient-specific fibulas and scapulas.
  • Comparison of reconstructions for cephalometric restoration, dental implant placement, and pedicle length.

Main Results:

  • Vertically oriented scapula improved orbital floor and maxillary height (p<0.001) but reduced dental implantability (p<0.001) compared to fibula.
  • Fibula provided better maxillary projection in midline-crossing defects due to more osteotomy options.
  • Scapula and fibula reconstructions were suitable for dental implants with comparable pedicle lengths, favoring scapula in extensive defects.

Conclusions:

  • Fibular and scapular reconstructions offer unique benefits for maxillectomy defects.
  • The choice between fibula and scapula depends on specific defect morphology and reconstruction goals.
  • Virtual analysis facilitates goal-oriented, patient-specific reconstructive planning.