Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Correction of connectivity induced by autocorrelation and filtering in resting state functional near-infrared spectroscopy data.

Journal of neuroscience methods·2026

Same author

Prefrontal contributions to the executive control of visuospatial working memory across primate species.

Frontiers in neuroanatomy·2026

Same author

Increasing the quantity of electrical stimulation pulses reduces cortical response inhibition.

Brain stimulation·2025

Same author

Topographic Organization of Saccade-Related Response Field Properties in the Marmoset Posterior Parietal Cortex.

eNeuro·2025

Same author

Local field potential phase modulates the evoked response to electrical stimulation in visual cortex.

Journal of neural engineering·2025

Same author

Language networks of normal-hearing infants exhibit topological differences between resting and steady states: An fNIRS functional connectivity study.

Human brain mapping·2024

Same journal

High-Fidelity Transcranial Ultrasound Multi-focal Stimulation via Physics-Aware Hologram Technique.

Brain stimulation·2026

Same journal

Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation Is Associated With Higher Gastric Antral Motility in Septic Patients With Acute Gastrointestinal Injury: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Pilot Trial with Blinded Outcome Assessment.

Brain stimulation·2026

Same journal

Empirical limitations of current low-intensity focused ultrasound simulation platforms.

Brain stimulation·2026

Same journal

Phase-synchronized iTBS and tACS at 40 Hz gamma frequency: The impact on working memory performance and functional connectivity.

Brain stimulation·2026

Same journal

Target-specific TMS-evoked motor-network responsiveness after acute ischaemic stroke.

Brain stimulation·2026

Same journal

Corrigendum to tractography-guided versus clinical contact selection for deep brain stimulation in tremor - A prospective clinical trial.

Brain stimulation·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 6, 2025

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns

Published on: May 12, 2019

Microstimulation-evoked neural responses in visual cortex are depth dependent.

Tim Allison-Walker¹, Maureen A Hagan², Nicholas S C Price²

¹Department of Physiology and Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Vic, 3800, Australia; ARC Centre of Excellence for Integrative Brain Function, Australia; Monash Vision Group, Monash University, Clayton, Vic, 3800, Australia.

Brain Stimulation

|May 11, 2021

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Understanding cortical visual prosthesis electrode placement is key. Superficial stimulation sites yield lower thresholds and higher firing rates, suggesting optimal placement in layers 2/3 and the top of layer 5 for visual prostheses.

Keywords:

Cortical stimulation Depth Lamina Visual cortex Visual prostheses

More Related Videos

Computational Modeling of Retinal Neurons for Visual Prosthesis Research - Fundamental Approaches

Computational Modeling of Retinal Neurons for Visual Prosthesis Research - Fundamental Approaches

Published on: June 21, 2022

Monocular Visual Deprivation and Ocular Dominance Plasticity Measurement in the Mouse Primary Visual Cortex

Monocular Visual Deprivation and Ocular Dominance Plasticity Measurement in the Mouse Primary Visual Cortex

Published on: February 8, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 6, 2025

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns

Published on: May 12, 2019

Computational Modeling of Retinal Neurons for Visual Prosthesis Research - Fundamental Approaches

Computational Modeling of Retinal Neurons for Visual Prosthesis Research - Fundamental Approaches

Published on: June 21, 2022

Monocular Visual Deprivation and Ocular Dominance Plasticity Measurement in the Mouse Primary Visual Cortex

Monocular Visual Deprivation and Ocular Dominance Plasticity Measurement in the Mouse Primary Visual Cortex

Published on: February 8, 2020

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Biomedical Engineering
Visual Prosthetics

Background:

Cortical visual prostheses utilize penetrating electrode arrays for microstimulation.
Optimizing electrode placement requires understanding neural responses at varying cortical depths.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate how neural responses to microstimulation vary with cortical depth.
To determine optimal electrode placement for visual prostheses.

Main Methods:

A 32-channel electrode array was inserted into the primary visual cortex of rats.
Microstimulation was applied across cortical depths (1600 µm), and neural activity was recorded simultaneously.

Main Results:

Microstimulation elevated neuronal firing rates at all cortical depths.
Superficial stimulation sites showed higher firing rates and lower thresholds compared to deep sites.
The spread of evoked activity depended on stimulation depth.

Conclusions:

Superficial visual cortex stimulation (layers 2/3) offers the lowest thresholds for neural activity.
Deep layer stimulation (top of layer 5) evokes the most activity across the cortical column.
Optimal electrode placement for visual prostheses is suggested to be in layers 2/3 and the top of layer 5.