Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

393
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
393
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.6K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.6K
Halo Effect01:27

Halo Effect

113
The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...
113
Self-Serving Bias01:29

Self-Serving Bias

57
Self-serving bias is a cognitive phenomenon in which individuals attribute positive outcomes to internal factors such as their abilities, intelligence, or effort while attributing negative outcomes to external circumstances. This cognitive distortion helps maintain self-esteem but can also impede objective self-assessment.Theoretical Explanations of Self-Serving BiasTwo primary theories explain the self-serving bias: the cognitive explanation and the motivational explanation.The cognitive...
57
Motivational Bias01:25

Motivational Bias

173
Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...
173
First Impression01:09

First Impression

52
First impressions play a crucial role in social perception, shaping how individuals assess others in professional, academic, and interpersonal contexts. Psychological research highlights the significance of cognitive biases, such as the primacy and recency effects, which influence how people interpret and recall information.The Primacy Effect and Cognitive AnchoringThe primacy effect describes the tendency for initial information to impact judgment disproportionately. When individuals encounter...
52

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Can we train better medical intuition? Exploring the potential of debiasing interventions.

Presse medicale (Paris, France : 1983)·2026
Same author

Using large language models to estimate belief strength in reasoning.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

Intuitive insight: Fast associative processes drive sound creative thinking.

Cognition·2026
Same author

Humans and LLMs rate deliberation as superior to intuition on complex reasoning tasks.

Communications psychology·2025
Same author

Moses illusions, fast and slow.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2025
Same author

Cognitive Load and Challenges in Self-regulation: An Introduction and Reflection on the Topical Collection.

Educational psychology review·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 5, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.0K

Recognizing biased reasoning: Conflict detection during decision-making and decision-evaluation.

Eva M Janssen1, Samuël B Velinga1, Wim de Neys2

  • 1Department of Education, Utrecht University, the Netherlands.

Acta Psychologica
|May 14, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Cognitive biases are common, but their mechanisms are debated. This study shows conflict detection, an awareness of reasoning errors, occurs when evaluating others' decisions, not just making one's own.

Keywords:
Conflict detectionDecision-evaluationHeuristics and biasesReasoning and decision-making

More Related Videos

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.2K
Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
12:10

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

2.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 5, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.0K
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.2K
Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
12:10

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

2.8K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Cognitive biases are pervasive, yet the underlying mechanisms of biased reasoning remain unclear.
  • Recent research suggests individuals detect errors in their own reasoning (conflict detection).
  • Existing studies on conflict detection have primarily used problem-solving tasks requiring personal decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if conflict detection extends to evaluating decisions made by others.
  • To examine conflict detection in vignette tasks versus traditional problem-solving tasks.
  • To assess the reliability of confidence and response time measures for conflict detection.

Main Methods:

  • 159 participants completed vignette tasks and problem-solving tasks.
  • Conflict detection was measured using confidence ratings and response times.
  • Analysis focused on sensitivity to conflict in both decision-making and decision-evaluation contexts.

Main Results:

  • Conflict detection was observed in both decision-making and decision-evaluation tasks.
  • Decreased confidence served as a reliable indicator of conflict detection.
  • Response time was a less reliable measure for conflict detection in the novel vignette tasks.

Conclusions:

  • Conflict detection is not limited to personal decision-making but also occurs when evaluating others' decisions.
  • Confidence ratings are a more robust measure of conflict detection than response times for these tasks.
  • Findings have implications for educational settings, particularly in feedback on student reasoning.