Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 5, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
JAK-inhibitors for coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19): a meta-analysis
Chong-Xiang Chen1,2,3, Jiao-Jiao Wang4, Huan Li1,3
1Department of Hematologic Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Insights
Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, including ruxolitinib and baricitinib, reduced mortality and invasive mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 patients. However, their impact on intensive care unit admissions and acute respiratory distress syndrome was borderline, with no effect on hospitalization length.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacology
- Infectious Diseases
- Critical Care Medicine
Background:
- Coronavirus infectious disease-2019 (COVID-19) poses significant risks, including high mortality and respiratory complications.
- Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have emerged as potential therapeutic agents for managing severe COVID-19.
- Understanding the safety and efficacy of JAK-inhibitors in COVID-19 patients is crucial for clinical decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically evaluate the safety and efficacy of JAK-inhibitors in patients with COVID-19.
- To assess the impact of JAK-inhibitors on key clinical outcomes, including mortality, mechanical ventilation, ICU admission, ARDS, and hospitalization duration.
- To analyze data from published cohort studies and clinical trials on JAK-inhibitor use in COVID-19.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of published literature on JAK-inhibitor use in COVID-19 patients.
- Inclusion of studies published between January 1st and March 6th, 2021.
- Quality assessment using Newcastle-Ottawa and Jadad scales; disease severity used as a proxy for treatment timing.
- Analysis of data from 6 cohort studies and 5 clinical trials involving 2367 patients treated with ruxolitinib or baricitinib.
Main Results:
- JAK-inhibitors significantly decreased the need for invasive mechanical ventilation (RR = 0.63; P = 0.002) and reduced overall mortality (RR = 0.42; P < 0.001).
- Ruxolitinib and baricitinib showed significant reductions in mortality (RR = 0.33 and RR = 0.44, respectively).
- Borderline impact was observed on intensive care unit admission (RR = 0.24; P = 0.05) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (RR = 0.50; P = 0.16).
- No significant decrease in the length of hospitalization was found (MD = -0.18; P = 0.94).
Conclusions:
- JAK-inhibitors demonstrate a significant survival benefit and reduce the need for mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 patients.
- The timing of JAK-inhibitor administration during COVID-19 treatment may influence outcomes, but this requires further consistent reporting in studies.
- Ruxolitinib and baricitinib show promise in managing severe COVID-19, warranting continued investigation into optimal treatment protocols.
Abstract:
We analyzed reports on safety and efficacy of JAK-inhibitors in patients with coronavirus infectious disease-2019 (COVID-19) published between January 1st and March 6th 2021 using the Newcastle-Ottawa and Jadad scales for quality assessment. We used disease severity as a proxy for time when JAK-inhibitor therapy was started. We identified 6 cohort studies and 5 clinical trials involving 2367 subjects treated with ruxolitinib (N = 3) or baricitinib 45 (N = 8). Use of JAK-inhibitors decreased use of invasive mechanical ventilation (RR = 0.63; [95% Confidence Interval (CI), 0.47, 0.84]; P = 0.002) and had borderline impact on rates of intensive care unit (ICU) admission (RR = 0.24 [0.06, 1.02]; P = 0.05) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS; RR = 0.50 [0.19, 1.33]; P = 0.16). JAK-inhibitors did not decrease length of hospitalization (mean difference (MD) -0.18 [-4.54, 4.18]; P = 0.94). Relative risks of death for both drugs were 0.42 [0.30, 0.59] (P < 0.001), for ruxolitinib, RR = 0.33 (0.13, 0.88; P = 0.03) and for baricitinib RR = 0.44 (0.31, 0.63; P < 0.001). Timing of JAK-inhibitor treatment during the course of COVID-19 treatment may be important in determining impact on outcome. However, these data are not consistently reported.
More Related Videos
09:31Fluorescence-based Neuraminidase Inhibition Assay to Assess the Susceptibility of Influenza Viruses to The Neuraminidase Inhibitor Class of Antivirals
Published on: April 15, 2017
03:53Author Spotlight: Advancements in Multiplex Detection of Respiratory Viruses
Published on: November 10, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Antimicrobial Effectiveness
Inhibition of Cdk Activity
Pharmacokinetics: Drug–Food and Drug–Viral Interactions
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors
Drug Product Performance: In Vitro–In Vivo Correlation
Eukaryotic Transcription Inhibitors
Eukaryotic transcription inhibitors usually contain two distinct domains, a...