Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 5, 2025

Cardiac Pressure-Volume Loop Analysis Using Conductance Catheters in Mice
Published on: September 17, 2015
Sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril on exercise capacity in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection
Marcelo Rodrigues Dos Santos1, Maria-Janieire de Nazaré Nunes Alves1, Camila Paixão Jordão1
1Instituto Do Coração (InCor), Hospital Das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Insights
Sacubitril/valsartan did not significantly improve exercise capacity, measured by peak oxygen consumption and the 6-minute walk test, compared to enalapril in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction over 24 weeks.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Exercise Physiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Sacubitril/valsartan is known to reduce mortality in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
- The impact of sacubitril/valsartan on exercise capacity in HFrEF patients compared to enalapril remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effects of sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril on exercise capacity in patients with HFrEF.
- To evaluate changes in peak oxygen consumption (VO2) and 6-minute walk test (6-MWT) performance.
Main Methods:
- A randomized trial involving 52 HFrEF participants (left ventricular ejection fraction <40%).
- Participants received either sacubitril/valsartan (target 400 mg/day) or enalapril (target 40 mg/day) for 24 weeks.
- Exercise capacity assessed via cardiopulmonary exercise testing (peak VO2) and 6-MWT.
Main Results:
- Both sacubitril/valsartan and enalapril showed increases in peak VO2 and 6-MWT over 24 weeks.
- No statistically significant differences in the improvement of peak VO2 or 6-MWT were observed between the sacubitril/valsartan and enalapril groups at 12 or 24 weeks.
- While sacubitril/valsartan showed a trend towards greater improvement in 6-MWT at 24 weeks, this difference was not statistically significant.
Conclusions:
- Sacubitril/valsartan did not offer substantial improvements in peak VO2 or 6-MWT compared to enalapril in HFrEF patients.
- Exercise capacity benefits observed were similar between the two treatment groups over the 24-week study period.
Abstract:
Sacubitril/valsartan reduces mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) when compared with enalapril. However, it is unknown the effect of both treatments on exercise capacity. We compared sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril in patients with HFrEF based on peak oxygen consumption (VO2) and 6-minute walk test (6-MWT).
Methods:
We included 52 participants with HFrEF with a left ventricular ejection fraction <40% to receive either sacubitril/valsartan (target dose of 400 mg daily) or enalapril (target dose of 40 mg daily). Peak VO2 was measured by using cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Six-minute walk test was also performed.
Results:
At 12 weeks, the sacubitril/valsartan (mean dose 382.6 ± 57.6 mg daily) group had increased peak VO2 of 13.1% (19.35 ± 0.99 to 21.89 ± 1.04 mL/kg/min) and enalapril (mean dose 34.4 ± 9.2 mg daily) 5.6% (18.58 ± 1.19 to 19.62 ± 1.25 mL/kg/min). However, no difference was found between groups (P = .332 interaction). At 24 weeks, peak VO2 increased 13.5% (19.35 ± 0.99 to 21.96 ± 0.98 mL/kg/min) and 12.0% (18.58 ± 1.19 to 20.82 ± 1.18 mL/kg/min) in sacubitril/valsartan (mean dose 400 ± 0 mg daily) and enalapril (mean dose 32.7 ± 11.0 mg daily), respectively. However, no differences were found between groups (P= .332 interaction). At 12 weeks, 6-MWT increased in both groups (sacubitril/valsartan: 459 ± 18 to 488 ± 17 meters [6.3%] and enalapril: 443 ± 22 to 477 ± 21 meters [7.7%]). At 24 weeks, sacubitril/valsartan increased 18.3% from baseline (543 ± 26 meters) and enalapril decreased slightly to 6.8% (473 ± 31 meters), but no differences existed between groups (P= .257 interaction).
Conclusions:
Compared to enalapril, sacubitril/valsartan did not substantially improve peak VO2 or 6-MWT after 12 or 24 weeks in participants with HFrEF. (NEPRIExTol-HF Trial, ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03190304).
More Related Videos
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
04:24A Novel Digital Platform for a Monitored Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program
Published on: April 19, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies