Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 5, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
Quantifying collective intelligence in human groups
Christoph Riedl1,2,3,4,5, Young Ji Kim6, Pranav Gupta7
1D'Amore-McKim School of Business, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115; c.riedl@neu.edu.
Abstract:
Collective intelligence (CI) is critical to solving many scientific, business, and other problems, but groups often fail to achieve it. Here, we analyze data on group performance from 22 studies, including 5,279 individuals in 1,356 groups. Our results support the conclusion that a robust CI factor characterizes a group's ability to work together across a diverse set of tasks. We further show that CI is predicted by the proportion of women in the group, mediated by average social perceptiveness of group members, and that it predicts performance on various out-of-sample criterion tasks. We also find that, overall, group collaboration process is more important in predicting CI than the skill of individual members.
More Related Videos
06:18The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
Published on: October 20, 2022
06:57Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks
Published on: August 9, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Intelligence
Measures of Intelligence
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
Binet's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence
Triarchic Theory of Intelligence
Wechsler's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence
Biological Influences on Intelligence