Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Intelligence01:27

Intelligence

8.1K
The term "intelligence" is complex because it refers to both behavior and individuals, and its interpretation varies across cultures. European Americans tend to link intelligence with reasoning and cognitive skills, while in Kenya, it is tied to responsible participation in family and social life. In Uganda, intelligence is seen as the ability to know the right actions and carry them out effectively, while the Iatmul people of Papua New Guinea associate it with the capacity to remember...
8.1K
Measures of Intelligence01:29

Measures of Intelligence

8.0K
Psychologists measure intelligence by using standardized tests that produce a score known as the intelligence quotient or IQ. To understand IQ tests, it's important to recognize the key principles behind their construction: validity, reliability, and standardization.
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
8.0K
Binet's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence01:23

Binet's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence

1.4K
Alfred Binet, along with his student Théophile Simon, was tasked by the French Ministry of Education in 1904 to create a method for identifying students who struggled to learn through conventional classroom instruction. This initiative aimed to address overcrowding by placing such students in specialized schools. Binet and Simon developed an intelligence test comprising 30 tasks, ranging from simple commands, like touching one's nose or ear, to more complex tasks, such as drawing...
1.4K
Triarchic Theory of Intelligence01:24

Triarchic Theory of Intelligence

9.2K
Robert Sternberg's triarchic theory of intelligence posits that intelligence is composed of three distinct but interrelated components: analytical, creative, and practical intelligence.
9.2K
Wechsler's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence01:23

Wechsler's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence

1.8K
David Wechsler, a psychologist who worked with World War I veterans, developed a significant IQ test in 1939 called the Wechsler-Bellevue Intelligence Scale. This test was innovative because it combined several subtests that measured both verbal and nonverbal skills, reflecting Wechsler's belief that intelligence is a global capacity involving purposeful action, rational thinking, and effective interaction with the environment. This test later evolved into the Wechsler Adult Intelligence...
1.8K
Biological Influences on Intelligence01:30

Biological Influences on Intelligence

310
Intelligence is often thought to be linked to brain size, but the relationship is more complex than that. While brain size does correlate modestly with some abilities, like verbal skills, the connection is weaker for others, such as spatial reasoning. Other factors, like brain structure, also play crucial roles. For instance, despite Einstein's smaller-than-average brain, his parietal cortex, which is involved in spatial reasoning, was 15% wider, suggesting that neural density might matter...
310

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Toward a science of human-AI teaming for decision making: A complementarity framework.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same author

Characterizing population-level changes in human behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Diffusion of complex contagions is shaped by a trade-off between reach and reinforcement.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

When combinations of humans and AI are useful: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nature human behaviour·2024
Same author

Cognitive versatility and adaptation to fluid participation in hospital emergency department teams.

Frontiers in psychology·2024
Same author

Diversity of contributions is not efficient but is essential for science.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2024
Same journal

In This Issue.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Correction for Otsuki et al., Extracellular sulfatases support cartilage homeostasis by regulating BMP and FGF signaling pathways.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Hive mind: Microbial communities and the making of memory.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Targets for disease modification in schizophrenia: New findings add to evidence for the involvement of the immune complement system.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Correction for Wang et al., The role of reduced aerosol masking from air pollutant emission reductions in recent global warming acceleration (2013-2023).

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Correction for Mishra, Ecology is not yet ready for AI-and why that matters.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 5, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.6K

Quantifying collective intelligence in human groups.

Christoph Riedl1,2,3,4,5, Young Ji Kim6, Pranav Gupta7

  • 1D'Amore-McKim School of Business, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115; c.riedl@neu.edu.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
|May 18, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Collective intelligence (CI) is vital for problem-solving, but groups often struggle to achieve it. This study found that group collaboration and the proportion of women predict CI, which in turn enhances group performance.

Keywords:
collective intelligencehuman groupsteam performance

More Related Videos

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.3K
Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks
06:57

Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks

Published on: August 9, 2016

11.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 5, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.6K
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.3K
Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks
06:57

Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks

Published on: August 9, 2016

11.6K

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior
  • Group Dynamics

Background:

  • Collective intelligence (CI) is crucial for addressing complex challenges in science and business.
  • Groups frequently underperform, failing to reach their full collective potential.
  • Understanding the factors that predict and enhance group CI is essential.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify key predictors of collective intelligence (CI) across diverse group tasks.
  • To investigate the role of group composition, specifically gender diversity, in CI.
  • To determine whether group processes or individual skills are more influential for CI.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of group performance data from 22 studies, encompassing 5,279 individuals in 1,356 groups.
  • Statistical modeling to identify factors predicting CI and its impact on performance.
  • Examination of mediation effects, such as social perceptiveness, in the relationship between group composition and CI.

Main Results:

  • A robust collective intelligence factor was identified, demonstrating a group's general ability to collaborate effectively.
  • The proportion of women in a group significantly predicted CI, mediated by members' average social perceptiveness.
  • Group collaboration processes were found to be more critical for predicting CI than individual member skills.

Conclusions:

  • Collective intelligence is a measurable group-level trait influenced by diversity and social dynamics.
  • Enhancing group composition (e.g., gender diversity) and collaboration processes can improve collective intelligence.
  • Focusing on group dynamics and social perceptiveness offers a promising avenue for boosting group performance and problem-solving capabilities.