Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 5, 2025

'Boden Food Plate': Novel Interactive Web-based Method for the Assessment of Dietary Intake
Published on: September 18, 2018
A systematic review and meta-analysis of discrepancies between logged and self-reported digital media use
Douglas A Parry1, Brittany I Davidson2,3, Craig J R Sewall4
1Department of Information Science, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa. dougaparry@sun.ac.za.
Abstract:
There is widespread public and academic interest in understanding the uses and effects of digital media. Scholars primarily use self-report measures of the quantity or duration of media use as proxies for more objective measures, but the validity of these self-reports remains unclear. Advancements in data collection techniques have produced a collection of studies indexing both self-reported and log-based measures. To assess the alignment between these measures, we conducted a pre-registered meta-analysis of this research. Based on 106 effect sizes, we found that self-reported media use correlates only moderately with logged measurements, that self-reports were rarely an accurate reflection of logged media use and that measures of problematic media use show an even weaker association with usage logs. These findings raise concerns about the validity of findings relying solely on self-reported measures of media use.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Self-Discrepancy and Its Effects
Social Foundations of Self IV: Self in Digital Communication
Strategies of Self-Presentation III: Self-Monitoring
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping

