"Shared Decision-Making" in Athletes With Known Cardiac Disease: Interpretation and Implementation in the Real World

Recommendations for addressing sporting eligibility and disqualification in athletes with heart disease have traditionally used a paternalistic approach with cardiologists making a binary "yes-no" decision. This paradigm has recently evolved to a shared decision-making model recognizing and respecting the autonomy of the athlete while instituting safeguards to mitigate risk where possible. How well this paradigm is understood or has been integrated into the athletic trainer (AT) community is unknown.

Athletic trainers from the Ohio High School Athletic Association were surveyed.

Of 107 ATs who responded, we found that the majority had not heard of the term "shared decision-making" in the context of sporting participation [62.6%, confidence interval (CI) 0.53-0.72 vs 37.4%, CI 0.28-0.47]. Furthermore, we found large discrepancies as to how ATs would interpret and implement recommendations from cardiologists.

This study highlights the need to educate and improve communication between AT, sports medicine physicians, and sports cardiologists if shared decision-making strategies are to become widely implemented.