Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 5, 2025

Automated Robotic Liquid Handling Assembly of Modular DNA Devices
Published on: December 1, 2017
Prototypes for automating product system model assembly
Brandon Kuczenski1, Chris Mutel2, Michael Srocka3
1GDIT, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
Introduction:
The flexibility of life cycle inventory (LCI) background data selection is increasing with the increasing availability of data, but this comes along with the challenge of using the background data with primary life cycle inventory data. To relieve the burden on the practitioner to create the linkages and reduce bias, this study aimed at applying automation to create foreground LCI from primary data and link it to background data to construct product system models (PSM).
Methods:
Three experienced LCA software developers were commissioned to independently develop software prototypes to address the problem of how to generate an operable PSM from a complex product specification. The participants were given a confidential product specification in the form of a Bill of Materials (BOM) and were asked to develop and test prototype software under a limited time period that converted the BOM into a foreground model and linked it with one or more a background datasets, along with a list of other functional requirements. The resulting prototypes were compared and tested with additional product specifications.
Results:
Each developer took a distinct approach to the problem. One approach used semantic similarity relations to identify best-fit background datasets. Another approach focused on producing a flexible description of the model structure that removed redundancy and permitted aggregation. Another approach provided an interactive web application for matching product components to standardized product classification systems to facilitate characterization and linking.
Discussion:
Four distinct steps were identified in the broader problem of automating PSM construction: creating a foreground model from product data, determining the quantitative properties of foreground model flows, linking flows to background datasets, and expressing the linked model in a format that could be used by existing LCA software. The three prototypes are complementary in that they address different steps and demonstrate alternative approaches. Manual work was still required in each case, especially in the descriptions of the product flows that must be provided by background datasets.
Conclusion:
The study demonstrates the utility of a distributed, comparative software development, as applied to the problem of LCA software. The results demonstrate that the problem of automated PSM construction is tractable. The prototypes created advance the state of the art for LCA software.
Related Concept Videos
Mechanistic Models: Overview of Compartment Models
Stereotype Content Model
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
Protein Complex Assembly
Many viruses self-assemble into a fully functional unit using the infected host cell to...
Protein Complex Assembly
Predicting Products: Substitution vs. Elimination
The following factors can influence the mechanisms competing against each other:

