Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 5, 2025

Author Spotlight: A Pharmacodissection Approach to Uncover Mechanisms in Cardiovascular Disease Risk Populations
Published on: July 21, 2023
Effect of Biologics on Cardiovascular Inflammation: Mechanistic Insights and Risk Reduction
George E Fragoulis1, Stergios Soulaidopoulos2, Petros P Sfikakis1
1Rheumatology Unit, Joint Rheumatology Program, Medical School, First Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Laiko" General Hospital, Athens, 115 27, Greece.
Insights
Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) may reduce cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs) by controlling inflammation. More research, including randomized controlled trials, is needed to confirm these benefits.
Area of Science:
- Rheumatology and Cardiology
- Immunology and Inflammation
- Vascular Biology
Background:
- Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is closely linked to inflammation, a key factor in autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs).
- Controlling inflammation in ARDs may reduce associated CVD risk, but results from immunomodulatory treatments have been conflicting.
- Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) show promise in managing ARDs and potentially mitigating CVD risk.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the evidence on the effects of bDMARDs on cardiovascular health in patients with ARDs.
- To assess the impact of bDMARDs on inflammatory processes and vascular function in ARD patients.
- To evaluate the potential of bDMARDs in reducing CVD events in ARD populations.
Main Methods:
- Review of accumulating evidence and major clinical trials (e.g., CANTOS, CIRT) examining immunomodulatory treatments for CVD.
- Analysis of observational studies on RA patients treated with bDMARDs, focusing on lipid profiles, arterial stiffness, and endothelial function.
- Assessment of available data for TNF-inhibitors and other bDMARDs (e.g., tocilizumab, abatacept, rituximab) in RA and spondyloarthropathies (SpA).
Main Results:
- bDMARDs appear to favorably alter lipid profiles and improve arterial stiffness and endothelial function in RA patients, without adversely affecting the TC/HDL ratio.
- Observational studies suggest a lower risk of CVD events in RA patients treated with bDMARDs, particularly TNF-inhibitors.
- Data for SpA are less robust, but TNF-inhibitors show effects comparable to those in RA; newer biologics require further investigation.
Conclusions:
- bDMARDs may offer a beneficial effect on cardiac inflammation and function in various ARDs, likely through improved inflammation control.
- Emerging therapeutic options, including bDMARDs, show a positive impact on CVD in the context of ARDs.
- Randomized controlled trials are necessary to definitively assess the favorable effects of bDMARDs on CVD outcomes.
Abstract:
It is increasingly recognized that atherosclerosis and consequently cardiovascular disease (CVD) are closely linked with inflammatory processes. The latter is in the center of the pathogenic mechanism underlying autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARD). It follows then, that optimal control of inflammation in ARDs may lead to a decrease of the accompanied CVD risk. Major trials (eg, CANTOS, CIRT), aimed at examining the possible benefits of immunomodulatory treatments in CVD, demonstrated conflicting results. On the other hand, substantial evidence is accumulating about the possible beneficial effects of biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in patients with ARDs, particularly those with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It seems that bDMARDs (some more than others) alter the lipid profile in RA patients but do not adversely affect, in most cases, the TC/HDL ratio. Favorable effects are noted for arterial stiffness and endothelial function. This is reflected in the lower risk for CVD events, seen in observational studies of RA patients treated with bDMARDs. It should be stressed that more data exist for the TNF-inhibitors than for other bDMARDs, such as tocilizumab, abatacept and rituximab. As regards the spondyloarthropathies (SpA), data are less robust. For TNF-inhibitors, effects appear to be on par with those seen in RA but no conclusions can be drawn for newer biologic drugs used in SpA (eg, IL-17 blockers). Finally, there is accumulating evidence for a beneficial effect of immunosuppressive treatment in cardiac inflammation and function in several ARDs. Introduction of newer therapeutic options in clinical practice seem to have a positive impact on CVD in the setting of ARD. This is probably due to better control of inflammation, but direct improvement in vascular pathology is also a valid hypothesis. Most data are derived from observational studies and, therefore, randomized controlled trials are needed to assess the possible favorable effect of bDMARDs on CVD outcomes.
More Related Videos
12:50Screening Assays to Characterize Novel Endothelial Regulators Involved in the Inflammatory Response
Published on: September 15, 2017
07:48Intravenous Endotoxin Challenge in Healthy Humans: An Experimental Platform to Investigate and Modulate Systemic Inflammation
Published on: May 16, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Inflammatory Bowel Disease IV: Pharmacological Management
Pharmacologic...
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Biologic Agents: Anti-TNF
Psychoneuroimmunology: Cardiovascular Disease
A key area of focus in PNI is the relationship between stress and coronary...
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...
Myocarditis III: Medical Management