Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 4, 2025

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
Published on: January 7, 2019
Two Factor Structures Possible for the FACIT-Sp in Patients With Heart Failure.
Lubin R Deng1, Kevin S Masters2, Sarah J Schmiege3
1Denver/Seattle Center of Innovation, Department of Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Health Care System (L.R.D., E.H., D.B.B.), Aurora, Colorado, USA.
This study found that the two-factor and three-factor models of the Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT-Sp) are suitable for heart failure patients, unlike the single-factor model. The findings support using these validated structures for spiritual well-being assessment in this population.
Area of Science:
- Psychometrics
- Clinical Psychology
- Cardiology
Background:
- The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT-Sp) is a 12-item measure assessing spiritual well-being in chronic illness.
- Previous research proposed overall, two-factor (meaning/peace, faith), and three-factor (meaning, peace, faith) models for the FACIT-Sp, with no consensus on the optimal structure.
- The factor structure of the FACIT-Sp has not been previously examined in patients with heart failure.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the factor structure of the FACIT-Sp in patients diagnosed with heart failure.
- To evaluate the suitability of previously proposed models (single-factor, two-factor, and three-factor) for the FACIT-Sp within a heart failure cohort.
Main Methods:
- A confirmatory factor analysis framework was employed using baseline data from 217 heart failure patients in the CASA trial.
- Three competing models (single-factor, two-factor, and three-factor) were tested and subsequently confirmed with 12-month data.
- Model modifications were performed based on empirical inspection of baseline data and validated with 12-month data; internal consistency and correlations with quality of life were assessed.
Main Results:
- All three models exhibited strong factor loadings, with the exception of negatively worded items.
- The two-factor and three-factor models demonstrated reasonable fit after modifications, whereas the single-factor model showed poor fit (RMSEA 0.14, CFI 0.85, SRMR 0.09).
- The two-factor (RMSEA 0.09, CFI 0.93, SRMR 0.05) and three-factor (RMSEA 0.06, CFI 0.97, SRMR 0.04) models showed improved fit, with sufficient internal consistency for all factors.
Conclusions:
- Both the two-factor and three-factor models of the FACIT-Sp are supported in patients with heart failure.
- The three-factor model provided a superior statistical fit, although its interpretability was not significantly enhanced compared to the two-factor model.
- These findings suggest that the FACIT-Sp can be reliably used with either a two-factor or three-factor structure in heart failure populations, with attention to item wording.
More Related Videos
05:16Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
09:20Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Published on: February 13, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies