Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Replication in Prokaryotes01:32

Replication in Prokaryotes

26.1K
DNA replication has three main steps: initiation, elongation, and termination. Replication in prokaryotes begins when initiator proteins bind to the single origin of replication (ori) on the cell's circular chromosome. Replication then proceeds around the entire circle of the chromosome in each direction from the two replication forks, resulting in two DNA molecules.
Many Proteins Work Together to Replicate the Chromosome
Replication is coordinated and carried out by a host of specialized...
26.1K
Replication in Prokaryotes02:35

Replication in Prokaryotes

93.3K
Overview
93.3K
Replication in Eukaryotes01:29

Replication in Eukaryotes

15.6K
In eukaryotic cells, DNA replication is highly conserved and tightly regulated. Multiple linear chromosomes must be duplicated with high fidelity before cell division, so there are many proteins that fulfill specialized roles in the replication process. Replication occurs in three phases: initiation, elongation, and termination, and ends with two complete sets of chromosomes in the nucleus.
Many Proteins Orchestrate Replication at the Origin
Eukaryotic replication follows many of the same...
15.6K
Replication in Eukaryotes02:31

Replication in Eukaryotes

184.0K
Overview
184.0K
The Replisome03:01

The Replisome

8.2K
8.2K
The Replisome03:01

The Replisome

36.6K
DNA replication is carried out by a large complex of proteins that act in a coordinated matter to achieve high-fidelity DNA replication. Together this complex is known as the DNA replication machinery or the replisome.
The synthesis of the leading and lagging strands is a highly coordinated process. To explain this, the “Trombone model” was proposed by Bruce Alberts in 1980. The DNA loop formation starts when a primer is synthesized on the parent lagging strand. The loop grows with...
36.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

REFORMS: Consensus-based Recommendations for Machine-learning-based Science.

Science advances·2024
Same author

Can Short Psychological Interventions Affect Educational Performance? Revisiting the Effect of Self-Affirmation Interventions.

Psychological science·2020
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 4, 2025

Replication of the Ordered, Nonredundant Library of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PA14 Transposon Insertion Mutants
11:35

Replication of the Ordered, Nonredundant Library of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PA14 Transposon Insertion Mutants

Published on: May 4, 2018

8.3K

Nonreplicable publications are cited more than replicable ones.

Marta Serra-Garcia1, Uri Gneezy2

  • 1Rady School of Management, University of California, San Diego La Jolla, CA, USA. mserragarcia@ucsd.edu.

Science Advances
|May 22, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Published psychology and economics papers that fail replication are cited more than those that succeed. This citation bias persists even after replication failure is known, suggesting publication standards may prioritize interesting findings over reproducibility.

More Related Videos

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion
08:29

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion

Published on: March 31, 2022

4.6K
Global and Current Research Trends of Single-Cell Sequencing in Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study
07:50

Global and Current Research Trends of Single-Cell Sequencing in Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study

Published on: April 18, 2025

547

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 4, 2025

Replication of the Ordered, Nonredundant Library of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PA14 Transposon Insertion Mutants
11:35

Replication of the Ordered, Nonredundant Library of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PA14 Transposon Insertion Mutants

Published on: May 4, 2018

8.3K
An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion
08:29

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion

Published on: March 31, 2022

4.6K
Global and Current Research Trends of Single-Cell Sequencing in Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study
07:50

Global and Current Research Trends of Single-Cell Sequencing in Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study

Published on: April 18, 2025

547

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Economics
  • Bibliometrics
  • Scientific Publishing

Background:

  • Replication is crucial for scientific validity.
  • Studies suggest experts can predict replication success.
  • Non-replicable findings may still receive significant scholarly attention.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate citation patterns of replicable versus non-replicable studies.
  • To assess the impact of replication failure on study citations.
  • To explore reasons behind the publication of non-replicable research.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of publicly available citation data.
  • Examination of published papers in top psychology, economics, and general interest journals.
  • Tracking citations before and after replication failure publication.

Main Results:

  • Papers failing replication receive more citations than those that replicate.
  • Citation advantage for non-replicable papers persists post-replication failure.
  • Only 12% of citations acknowledge replication failures.

Conclusions:

  • A citation bias favors non-replicable findings in top journals.
  • Publication standards might be lowered for 'interesting' results, potentially compromising reproducibility.
  • The scientific community's attention to non-replicable research highlights a potential conflict between impact and rigor.