Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 4, 2025

Cooling Rate Dependent Ellipsometry Measurements to Determine the Dynamics of Thin Glassy Films
Published on: January 26, 2016
Optical computation of a spin glass dynamics with tunable complexity
M Leonetti1,2, E Hörmann3, L Leuzzi2,3
1Center for Life Nano Science@Sapienza, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, I-00161 Rome, Italy; marco.leonetti@cnr.it giorgio.parisi@roma1.infn.it.
Abstract:
Spin glasses (SGs) are paradigmatic models for physical, computer science, biological, and social systems. The problem of studying the dynamics for SG models is nondetermistic polynomial-time (NP) hard; that is, no algorithm solves it in polynomial time. Here we implement the optical simulation of an SG, exploiting the N segments of a wavefront-shaping device to play the role of the spin variables, combining the interference downstream of a scattering material to implement the random couplings between the spins (the [Formula: see text] matrix) and measuring the light intensity on a number P of targets to retrieve the energy of the system. By implementing a plain Metropolis algorithm, we are able to simulate the spin model dynamics, while the degree of complexity of the potential energy landscape and the region of phase diagram explored are user defined, acting on the ratio [Formula: see text] We study experimentally, numerically, and analytically this Hopfield-like system displaying a paramagnetic, ferromagnetic, and SG phase, and we demonstrate that the transition temperature [Formula: see text] to the glassy phase from the paramagnetic phase grows with α. We demonstrate the computational advantage of the optical SG where interaction terms are realized simultaneously when the independent light rays interfere on the detector's surface. This inherently parallel measurement of the energy provides a speedup with respect to purely in silico simulations scaling with N.
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Valence Bond Theory
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...
Fermi Level Dynamics
Electron affinity in semiconductors refers to the energy gap between the minimum of its conduction band and the vacuum level and it is a critical parameter in determining how easily a semiconductor can accept additional electrons.
The work...

