Pelvic and neonatal size correlations in light of evolutionary hypotheses

This study aimed to analyze the correlations between maternal size, neonatal size, and gestational variables.

Our sample comprises 131 mother-infant dyads. We investigated correlations between five neonatal traits (gestational age, birthweight, head, suboccipito-brematic, and abdominal girths), three maternal traits (height, BMI, and uterus height), and three pelvic variables (conjugate, inter-spinous diameters, and sub-pubic angle) using computed tomography pelvimetry.

We found that the five neonatal traits were significantly intercorrelated. BMI was not correlated with neonatal traits while maternal height was correlated with birthweight, suboccipito-brematic, and abdominal girth. In the multiple regression models, gestational age was correlated with birthweight, head, and abdominal girth. Among the neonatal and pelvimetry correlations, conjugate diameter was slightly correlated with suboccipito-bregmatic girth, but inter-spinous and sub-pubic angle were not correlated with neonatal traits. Uterus height predicted all neonatal variables, but it was not correlated with gestational age.

Our results suggest that fetal growth is shaped by maternal phenotype rather than external ecological factors. The association of the inlet size with suboccipito-bregmatic girth reflects the tight fit between the neonatal brain and the maternal pelvis dimensions, an adaptation that would reduce the risk of cephalo-pelvic disproportion, while the absence of tight fit at the midplane and outlet could be due to the effect of the pelvic relaxation. Uterus distention is not the only mechanism involved in the initiation of parturition. Birth and pregnancy are complex processes and we suggest that maternal-neonatal associations are the result of a combination of multiple obstetric tradeoffs.