Cerebral microemboli in mini-sternotomy compared to mini- thoracotomy for aortic valve replacement: a cross sectional

Marija Bozhinovska1, Matej Jenko1, Gordana Taleska Stupica1

  • 1Clinical Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Intensive Therapy, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloska 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Abstract

Insights

Mini-thoracotomy and mini-sternotomy approaches for aortic valve replacement showed no difference in cerebral microembolic load. Postoperative cognitive decline was associated with patient age, not microembolic signals.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Neurology
  • Minimally Invasive Procedures

Background:

  • Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (AVR) via mini-thoracotomy offers benefits over mini-sternotomy.
  • Concerns exist regarding potential increased cerebral embolization and neurologic decline with mini-thoracotomy due to limited surgical exposure.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare neurological complications between mini-thoracotomy and mini-sternotomy AVR.
  • To assess intraoperative cerebral microembolic signals and postoperative cognitive function.

Main Methods:

  • Trans-cranial Doppler monitored microembolic signals during AVR in 52 patients (25 mini-sternotomy, 27 mini-thoracotomy).
  • Cognitive function was evaluated using the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination Revised Test preoperatively and 30 days postoperatively.

Main Results:

  • No significant differences in microembolic load or cognitive decline between the two surgical groups.
  • Total microembolic signals correlated with cardiopulmonary bypass duration.
  • Postoperative cognitive decline was associated with patient age, not microembolic load.

Conclusions:

  • Both mini-thoracotomy and mini-sternotomy AVR demonstrate comparable intraoperative microembolic loads.
  • Age is a significant factor in postoperative cognitive decline following AVR, independent of microembolic signal burden.

Related Concept Videos