Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 4, 2025

Treatment with Locking Intramedullary Nailing for Intertrochanteric Fracture of the Femur Utilizing a New Awl with a Distal Positioner
Published on: June 6, 2025
Definitive Fixation Outcomes of Open Tibial Shaft Fractures: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.
Khalid Al-Hourani1, Richard Donovan2, Michael T Stoddart3
1Edinburgh Orthopaedics, The Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Unreamed intramedullary nailing (UN) for open tibial shaft fractures shows a reduced risk of reoperation compared to external fixation (EF). This benefit is more pronounced in Gustilo type III fractures, suggesting UN as a potentially superior fixation strategy.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Trauma Surgery
- Evidence-Based Medicine
Background:
- Open tibial shaft fractures present complex challenges in definitive fixation.
- Choosing the optimal fixation strategy is crucial for minimizing reoperation rates and improving patient outcomes.
- Existing evidence comparing different fixation methods requires synthesis to guide clinical practice.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of various definitive fixation strategies for open tibial shaft fractures.
- To determine if differences in outcomes exist between unreamed intramedullary nailing (UN), reamed intramedullary nailing, plate fixation, and external fixation (EF).
- To identify the fixation method associated with the lowest risk of unplanned reoperation.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis of randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials.
- Inclusion of adult patients with open tibial shaft fractures (AO-42) undergoing definitive fixation.
- Network analysis to model direct and indirect evidence, assessing unplanned reoperation rates as the primary outcome.
Main Results:
- Unreamed intramedullary nailing (UN) demonstrated a trend towards a lower risk of unplanned reoperation compared to external fixation (EF) (RR 0.67, moderate confidence).
- In Gustilo type III open fractures, UN showed a statistically significant reduction in reoperation risk versus EF (RR 0.61, P=0.05, moderate confidence).
- No significant difference in reoperation risk was found between UN and reamed intramedullary nailing (low confidence).
Conclusions:
- Intramedullary nailing, particularly UN, appears to reduce the risk of unplanned reoperations for open tibial shaft fractures compared to external fixation.
- The benefit of nailing is more evident in severe (Gustilo type III) open fractures.
- Future research should investigate major complication rates and quality of life outcomes in high-grade tibial shaft fractures.
More Related Videos
09:01Treatment of Ankle Osteoarthritis with Total Ankle Replacement Through a Lateral Transfibular Approach
Published on: January 24, 2018
07:35Creating Rigidly Stabilized Fractures for Assessing Intramembranous Ossification, Distraction Osteogenesis, or Healing of Critical Sized Defects
Published on: April 11, 2012