Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 4, 2025

Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty
Published on: February 27, 2018
Patient satisfaction following total knee arthroplasty using restricted kinematic alignment
Sarag Abhari1, Thomas M Hsing1,2, Max M Malkani3
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
Restricted kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) significantly improved patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes compared to traditional mechanical alignment. This advanced technique offers excellent results for TKA patients.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Biomechanical Engineering
Background:
- Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) aims to restore function and alleviate pain.
- Alternative alignment strategies, including kinematic and restricted kinematic alignment, are explored to enhance TKA outcomes.
- Preoperative varus deformity is a common consideration in TKA patient selection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the clinical results and patient satisfaction of TKA performed using a restricted kinematic alignment concept.
- To compare outcomes between restricted kinematic alignment and traditional neutral mechanical alignment in TKA.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study of 109 patients (115 knees) undergoing primary TKA with restricted kinematic alignment for preoperative varus deformity.
- Patients were stratified into three groups based on varus deformity severity (1-5°, 6-10°, >10°).
- Comparison with a matched cohort of 115 TKAs using neutral mechanical alignment and manual instrumentation.
Main Results:
- Restricted kinematic alignment group reported significantly higher patient satisfaction (93% vs. 81%, p < 0.006) and a higher mean Likert score (4.7 vs. 4.3, p < 0.001).
- Improved scores were observed in the kinematic group for KOOS, WOMAN, Forgotten Joint Score, and KSS scores at mean 17-month follow-up.
- The most frequent complication in both groups was arthrofibrosis requiring manipulation under anesthesia (6.1% kinematic vs. 7.8% mechanical).
Conclusions:
- Restricted kinematic alignment, facilitated by advanced technology for precise bone cuts and soft-tissue balancing, leads to excellent patient satisfaction in primary TKA.
- Further long-term studies are necessary to ascertain the durability of the restricted kinematic alignment method.
More Related Videos
09:51The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022
09:01Treatment of Ankle Osteoarthritis with Total Ankle Replacement Through a Lateral Transfibular Approach
Published on: January 24, 2018