Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 4, 2025
Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
A Nomogram for Predicting Multiple Metastases in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Large Population-Based
Yuhang Ge1, Renshen Xiang1, Jun Ren1
1Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery II, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Objectives:
The present study aims to discover the risk factors of multiple metastases and develop a functional nomogram to forecast multiple metastases in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients.
Methods:
mCRC cases were retrospectively collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2016. Survival times between multiple metastases and single metastasis were compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests. Risk factors for multiple metastases were determined by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, and a nomogram was developed to forecast the probability of multiple metastases in mCRC patients. We assessed the nomogram performance in terms of discrimination and calibration, including concordance index (C-index), area under the curve (AUC), and decision curve analysis (DCA). Bootstrap resampling was used as an internal verification method, and at the same time we select external data from Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University as independent validation sets.
Results:
A total of 5,302 cases were included in this study as training group, while 120 cases were as validation group. The patients with single metastasis and multiple metastases were 3,531 and 1,771, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) for patients with multiple metastases or single metastasis were 19 vs. 31 months, and 20 vs. 33 months, respectively. Based on the univariate and multivariate analyses, clinicopathological characteristics were associated with number of metastasis and were used to establish nomograms to predict the risk of multiple metastases. The C-indexes and AUC for the forecast of multiple metastases were 0.715 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.707-0.723), which showed the nomogram had good discrimination and calibration curves of the nomogram showed no significant bias from the reference line, indicating a good degree of calibration. In the validation group, the AUC was 0.734 (95% CI, 0.653-0.834), and calibration curve also showed no significant bias, indicating the favorable effects of our nomogram.
Conclusions:
We developed a new nomogram to predict the risk of multiple metastases. The nomogram shows the good prediction effect and can provide assistance for clinical diagnosis and treatment.
