Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 3, 2025

Non-fluoroscopic Catheter Tracking for Fluoroscopy Reduction in Interventional Electrophysiology
Published on: May 26, 2015
Simple periprocedural precautions to reduce Doppler microembolic signals during AF ablation
Marian Christoph1, David Poitz2, Christian Pfluecke2
1Technische Universität Dresden, Campus Chemnitz, Klinikum Chemnitz, Flemmingstrasse 2, 09116, Chemnitz, Germany. marian.christoph@tu-dresden.de.
Atrial fibrillation ablation generates numerous microembolic signals (MES), particularly during radiofrequency (RF) application. Shorter procedure times, higher activated clotting time (ACT), and contact force monitoring may reduce MES during ablation.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Neurology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedures can generate microembolic signals (MES) despite preventative measures.
- Understanding the sources and contributing factors of MES is crucial for patient safety during AF ablation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the incidence and characteristics of MES during AF ablation.
- To determine the relationship between MES and procedure time, specific procedural steps, activated clotting time (ACT), and catheter contact force.
Main Methods:
- A prospective trial involving 53 AF patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation using irrigated, point-by-point radiofrequency ablation.
- Continuous transcranial Doppler (TCD) monitoring of middle cerebral arteries throughout the ablation procedure.
Main Results:
- An average of 686±226 MES were detected, with 569±208 gaseous and 117±31 solid.
- The highest number of MES occurred during radiofrequency (RF) ablation (439±192 gaseous, 41±22 solid).
- Fewer MES were observed with shorter procedure times, higher ACT, and the use of contact force monitoring.
Conclusions:
- AF ablation with irrigated RF catheters generates significant MES, primarily during RF application.
- MES are influenced by total procedure duration and achieved ACT.
- Contact force monitoring may be a strategy to reduce MES during AF ablation.
Related Concept Videos
Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment:
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation

