Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

13.3K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
13.3K
Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

6.0K
Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
6.0K
Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test01:09

Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test

3.7K
In parametric statistics, two fundamental tests stand out for their utility and wide application: the Student's t-test and goodness-of-fit tests. These tests provide researchers with a robust method for drawing insights from data, testing hypotheses, and making informed decisions based on their findings.
The Student's t-test is a statistical test that examines if there is a statistically significant difference between the means of two groups. This test is instrumental when dealing with...
3.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Lived Experiences of Male Caregivers Supporting Individuals with Parkinson's Disease.

Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

User evaluation of an implementation toolkit for maternal-newborn care settings.

JBI evidence implementation·2025
Same author

River metabolism in the contiguous United States: A West of extremes.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Virtual delivery of the Target Word parent-implemented language intervention: A pragmatic waitlist control study.

International journal of speech-language pathology·2025
Same author

Maximizing the use of practice-based clinical data to track social communication development in autistic preschoolers.

Journal of communication disorders·2025
Same author

Why Did You Use That Test? Exploring Speech-Language Pathologists' Clinical Decision Making in Bilingual Language and Literacy Assessment.

American journal of speech-language pathology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 3, 2025

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

549

Adopting a Conceptual Validity Framework for Testing in Speech-Language Pathology.

Olivia Daub1, Barbara Jane Cunningham1, Marlene P Bagatto1

  • 1The University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.

American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
|June 1, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Adopting a validity framework improves speech-language pathology test use. Focusing on decisions, not just tests, enhances evidence-based assessment for clinicians and clients.

More Related Videos

A Protocol for Comprehensive Assessment of Bulbar Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ALS
12:43

A Protocol for Comprehensive Assessment of Bulbar Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ALS

Published on: February 21, 2011

35.4K
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

4.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 3, 2025

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

549
A Protocol for Comprehensive Assessment of Bulbar Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ALS
12:43

A Protocol for Comprehensive Assessment of Bulbar Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ALS

Published on: February 21, 2011

35.4K
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

4.0K

Area of Science:

  • Speech-language pathology
  • Psychometrics
  • Educational psychology

Background:

  • Inconsistent test selection and interpretation in speech-language pathology stem from a lack of evidence-based guidelines.
  • A significant barrier is the inconsistent adoption of a validity framework within the field.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To advocate for the adoption of the conceptual validity framework from the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing.
  • To demonstrate how this framework can improve clinical test development, use, and interpretation in speech-language pathology.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluation of the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing validity framework.
  • Analysis of the framework's relevance and integration into speech-language pathology clinical practice.
  • Assessment of costs and benefits for speech-language pathologists, clients, and test developers.

Main Results:

  • The Standards' validity framework shifts focus from tests to decisions made based on test results.
  • This approach necessitates critical evaluation of test application rather than adherence to rigid criteria.
  • Adoption promises significant improvements in how tests are utilized and valued in the profession.

Conclusions:

  • Implementing the Standards' validity framework will benefit speech-language pathologists, test developers, and clients through enhanced evidence-based assessment.
  • Recommendations include adoption by regulators, professional bodies, universities, and researchers as best practice.
  • This viewpoint outlines initial steps for integrating the framework into research and practice.