Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value01:13

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

892
In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
892
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

5.1K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
5.1K
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring01:25

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

1.1K
Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...
1.1K
Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis01:10

Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis

1.5K
The nurse documents nursing diagnoses and enters them into the patient record. The identified patient's nursing diagnosis is either written out with a plan of care or entered into the electronic health record.
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters...
1.5K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

402
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
402
False Memories01:18

False Memories

200
False memories represent a cognitive distortion in which individuals recall events that did not happen, or remember them in an altered form. This phenomenon highlights the brain's constructive nature in processing and recalling memories, emphasizing that memory is not a perfect representation of past events but rather a dynamic reconstruction influenced by various factors.
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
200

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Variability in epilepsy polygenic risk prediction across Taiwanese population and clinical cohorts.

Epilepsia·2026
Same author

From coexistence to antagonism: nutrient- and temperature-dependent interactions between Bacillus atrophaeus JunSE1L and Pseudomonas chlororaphis O6 with implications for the wheat rhizosphere.

Journal of biological engineering·2026
Same author

Identification of Novel Genetic Risk Variants Associated With Early-Onset Ischemic Stroke in Taiwan.

Neurology·2026
Same author

Non-Inversion Variants in Sporadic Hemophilia A Rarely Recur.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026
Same author

Genotype-Specific Postural Control Deficits in Hemophilia A: Insights from Center of Pressure Analysis Beyond Radiographic Arthropathy.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026
Same author

Health Performance in North America: An International Comparative Review of Canada and the United States with Implications for Women's Health Equity.

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 3, 2025

Semiconductor Sequencing for Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy
09:03

Semiconductor Sequencing for Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy

Published on: August 25, 2019

9.6K

Understanding False Negative in Prenatal Testing.

Mark I Evans1,2, Ming Chen3,4,5,6, David W Britt1

  • 1Fetal Medicine Foundation of America, Icahn School of Medicine at Mt. Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
|June 2, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

False negative results in medical tests, particularly prenatal genetic screening, can lead to unexpected affected births. Understanding screening versus diagnostic tests is crucial for informed patient care and managing these risks.

Keywords:
down syndrome screeningmendelian screening panelmicroarrayneural tube defectnoninvasive prenatal testing

More Related Videos

Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy on a Semiconductor Based Next-Generation Sequencing Platform
09:30

Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy on a Semiconductor Based Next-Generation Sequencing Platform

Published on: August 17, 2022

3.3K
Microsatellite DNA Genotyping and Flow Cytometry Ploidy Analyses of Formalin-fixed Paraffin-embedded Hydatidiform Molar Tissues
11:54

Microsatellite DNA Genotyping and Flow Cytometry Ploidy Analyses of Formalin-fixed Paraffin-embedded Hydatidiform Molar Tissues

Published on: October 20, 2019

9.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 3, 2025

Semiconductor Sequencing for Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy
09:03

Semiconductor Sequencing for Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy

Published on: August 25, 2019

9.6K
Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy on a Semiconductor Based Next-Generation Sequencing Platform
09:30

Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy on a Semiconductor Based Next-Generation Sequencing Platform

Published on: August 17, 2022

3.3K
Microsatellite DNA Genotyping and Flow Cytometry Ploidy Analyses of Formalin-fixed Paraffin-embedded Hydatidiform Molar Tissues
11:54

Microsatellite DNA Genotyping and Flow Cytometry Ploidy Analyses of Formalin-fixed Paraffin-embedded Hydatidiform Molar Tissues

Published on: October 20, 2019

9.3K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Diagnostics
  • Prenatal Genetics
  • Clinical Decision-Making

Background:

  • False negative results occur in both screening and diagnostic medical tests.
  • These errors pose significant risks, especially in prenatal settings, potentially leading to unexpected births of affected children.
  • The challenge of false negatives persists despite advancements in reproductive and prenatal genetic testing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To differentiate between screening and diagnostic tests in prenatal care.
  • To explore the trade-offs and choices involved in genetic testing strategies.
  • To highlight critical information for clinicians to ensure quality patient service and comprehension of false negative implications.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and conceptual analysis of screening vs. diagnosis.
  • Discussion of historical and current prenatal genetic testing approaches.
  • Synthesis of clinical considerations for managing false negative risks.

Main Results:

  • Clarification of fundamental differences between screening and diagnostic testing paradigms.
  • Identification of key decision points and associated risks in prenatal genetic testing.
  • Emphasis on the need for clinician awareness regarding false negative implications.

Conclusions:

  • Accurate comprehension of screening versus diagnostic roles is vital for patient counseling.
  • Clinicians must be aware of the potential for false negatives to provide optimal prenatal care.
  • Informed decision-making by both patients and healthcare providers can mitigate the impact of false negative results.