Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.1K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.1K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

393
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
393
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.4K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.4K
Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes01:15

Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes

102
Cognitive processes affect social behavior by guiding how individuals perceive, interpret, and respond to social stimuli. These mental processes enable individuals to assess others' behaviors, attribute causes to their actions, and form expectations based on past experiences.Causes of Behavior and Social JudgmentsIndividuals determine the causes of others' behaviors by distinguishing between personal traits and external circumstances. For example, if a friend frequently arrives late, an...
102
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

1.1K
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
1.1K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

855
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
855

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reducing Risk Misinformation and Miscommunication: A Sheaf-Theoretic Perspective.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same author

Necessary conditions for valid causal inference from observational data.

Critical reviews in toxicology·2026
Same author

Integrating Fragmented Risk Knowledge: Sheaf Theory for Risk Analysts.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same author

Combining Diverse Expert Opinions in Risk Analysis Using Relative Causal Knowledge.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same author

Improving the design of epidemiology studies that use biomonitoring for exposure assessment: a SciPinion panel recommendation.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same author

Living with risk, then and now: A dual review of Cam Grey's Living with Risk in the Late Roman World and of current AI-assisted book reviewing.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 3, 2025

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

820

Information Structures for Causally Explainable Decisions.

Louis Anthony Cox1

  • 1Department of Business Analytics, University of Colorado School of Business, and MoirAI, 503 N. Franklin Street, Denver, CO 80218, USA.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)
|June 2, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

AI agents need causal models to explain decisions under uncertainty, linking actions to outcomes and risks. This enables trustworthy recommendations by integrating fast pattern recognition with slower, deliberative reasoning for adaptive planning.

Keywords:
Bayesian networksXAIcausalitydecision analysisexplainable AIexplanationinformationpartially observable Markov decision processesreinforcement learningstochastic control

More Related Videos

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.0K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 3, 2025

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

820
The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.0K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.9K

Area of Science:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Decision Science
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • AI agents require explainability for trustworthy decision-making under uncertainty.
  • Normative decision theories inform AI by specifying actions, outcomes, probabilities, risks, and trade-offs.
  • AI systems must adapt to changing conditions by integrating rapid, learned responses with deliberative causal inference.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review how causal models and related concepts enable AI agents to provide trustworthy, explainable decision recommendations.
  • To outline a framework for AI systems to recognize and respond to changes affecting user goals.
  • To explore the integration of fast, intuitive AI responses with slower, deliberative reasoning for adaptive decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Review of concepts including conditional independence, causal models, heuristic search, uncertainty reduction, and value of information.
  • Identification of probabilistic causal dependencies among variables.
  • Development of methods for detecting relevant changes, representing them efficiently, and updating causal models and plans.

Main Results:

  • Causal models link actions to outcome probabilities, providing rationales for AI decisions.
  • AI systems can integrate learned patterns (System 1) with causal inference and planning (System 2) for adaptive responses.
  • Efficient representation and updating of causal models support goal achievement in uncertain environments.

Conclusions:

  • Causally explainable AI decisions enhance trustworthiness by clarifying the reasoning behind recommendations.
  • AI agents can achieve goals more effectively in uncertain environments by efficiently using information via causal models.
  • The reviewed concepts provide a principled framework for building adaptive, explainable AI decision support systems.