Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 3, 2025

Full-root Aortic Valve Replacement by Stentless Aortic Xenografts in Patients with Small Aortic Roots
Published on: May 21, 2017
Early outcomes of patient-prosthesis mismatch following aortic valve replacement
Serik Aitaliyev1, Egle Rumbinaitė2, Karolina Mėlinytė-Ankudavičė2
1Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kauno Klinikos, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Introduction:
Patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) has been associated with numerous short- and long-term adverse events. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of PPM on early postoperative results after aortic valve replacement (AVR) in daily practice.
Methods:
In this single-centre retrospective study, 150 non-consecutive patients from March 2019 to January 2020 with clinically indicated AVR with/without concomitant surgery were analysed. The study protocol included operative mortality, complication rate, and pre- and postoperative echocardiographic data. PPM was considered severe with indexed effective orifice area at <0.65 cm2/m2, moderate at 0.65-0.85 cm2/m2 and none at >0.85 cm2/m2.
Results:
Moderate PPM was observed in 16 patients (10.6%). No patient had severe PPM. PPM was not related to early mortality (r = 0.40, p = 0.630), intra- (r = -0.076, p = 0.352) and postoperative (r = -0.0134, p = 0.102) events.
Conclusion:
In this study, moderate PPM was a frequent finding after AVR, whereas severe PPM was not observed. PPM did not affect the early results after AVR. A long-term follow-up study in a large patient population is required to assess the actual influence of residual PPM.
Insights
Patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) after aortic valve replacement (AVR) was common but did not impact early outcomes. Further research is needed to understand the long-term effects of residual PPM.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) is linked to adverse events after aortic valve replacement (AVR).
- Understanding PPM's impact on early postoperative results is crucial for clinical practice.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effect of PPM on early postoperative results in patients undergoing AVR.
- To determine the incidence of moderate and severe PPM in a real-world clinical setting.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 150 patients undergoing AVR between March 2019 and January 2020.
- PPM was categorized based on indexed effective orifice area: severe (<0.65 cm²/m²), moderate (0.65-0.85 cm²/m²), and none (>0.85 cm²/m²).
- Outcomes assessed included operative mortality and complication rates.
Main Results:
- Moderate PPM was observed in 10.6% of patients; severe PPM was not found.
- PPM was not significantly associated with early mortality, or intra- and postoperative complications.
Conclusions:
- Moderate PPM is a frequent finding after AVR, but severe PPM is rare in this cohort.
- PPM did not influence early postoperative outcomes following AVR in this study.
- Long-term follow-up in a larger patient cohort is necessary to fully ascertain the impact of residual PPM.
More Related Videos
14:14Standardized Technique of Aortic Valve Re-implantation for Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement
Published on: December 11, 2017
05:31Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Replacement from Autologous Pericardium with a Self-Expandable Nitinol Stent in an Adult Sheep Model
Published on: June 8, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management