Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 3, 2025

Tools for the Real-Time Assessment of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection Model
Published on: April 6, 2021
Community Assessment for Public Health Emergency Response (CASPER) Following Hurricane Michael, Bay and Gulf
Edda Rodriguez1, Chris Duclos, Jessica Joiner
1Public Health Research Unit, Division of Community Health Promotion, Florida Department of Health, Tallahassee, Florida (Mss Rodriguez, Joiner, and Jordan, Mr Duclos, and Dr Reid); and Department of Public Health, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee (Dr Kintziger). Ms Rodriguez is now with Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Context:
On October 10, 2018, Hurricane Michael made landfall near Mexico Beach, Florida, as one of the strongest storms on record to hit the US mainland. Hurricane Michael brought strong winds, heavy rain, and life-threatening storm surge, causing extensive damage across the Florida Panhandle.
Objectives:
To assess community preparedness and effects experienced by Panhandle residents, including structural and economic losses, injury and illness, health care access, and suicide risk and ideation in the counties most severely impacted by Hurricane Michael.
Design:
The Florida Department of Health conducted a Community Assessment for Public Health Emergency Response (CASPER) in October and November 2019, a year after Hurricane Michael made landfall. CASPER is a 2-stage cluster sampling method designed to provide household-level information about a community's needs in a timely, inexpensive, and representative manner.
Setting:
A total of 30 clusters were randomly selected from Bay and Gulf Counties, Florida.
Participants:
In total, 178 face-to-face interviews were completed with adult residents 18 years or older.
Main Outcome Measures:
Hurricane-related impacts, including structural and economic losses, injury and illness, health care access; and mental health.
Results:
Almost half of respondents did not evacuate despite mandatory evacuation orders. Most houses (78.1%) received some damage, with more than half still not repaired 1 year later. Access to emergency supply kits, water, nonperishable foods, medications, and health care was common, though many reported needing supplies not included in their kit. Less than half reported having working household carbon monoxide detectors. Injuries and illnesses associated with the hurricane were uncommon; however, anxiety, depression, and insomnia were reported as occurring or worsening by more than one-third of respondents posthurricane.
Conclusions:
Increased education and communication regarding hurricane preparedness and recovery, which include clearer messaging on evacuation, improving emergency supply kits, importance of carbon monoxide detectors, and proper generator use, could enhance the safety of the community.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Applications of GIS: Disaster Management and Emergency Response
Responses to Drought and Flooding
Steps in Outbreak Investigation
Principles of Disease Surveillance
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...

