Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model01:29

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

94
The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...
94
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

13.3K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
13.3K
Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

6.0K
Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
6.0K
Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

345
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
345
Self-Report Tests of Personality01:22

Self-Report Tests of Personality

531
Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
531
Response Surface Methodology01:16

Response Surface Methodology

347
Response Surface Methodology (RSM) is a collection of statistical and mathematical techniques used to develop, improve, and optimize processes. It is particularly valuable when many input variables or factors potentially influence a response variable.
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
347

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Biocompatibility of silk fibroin nanofibers scaffold with olfactory ensheathing cells].

Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery·2009
Same author

[Association of tryptophan hydroxylase gene A218C and serotonin transporter gene polymorphism with essential hypertension in Chinese northern Han population].

Zhonghua xin xue guan bing za zhi·2009
Same author

An FES cycling control system based on CPG.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2009
Same author

One example on how colloidal nano- and microparticles could contribute to medicine.

Nanomedicine (London, England)·2009
Same author

[Mutational analysis of Meq, RLORF4, RLORF12 and 132bpr genes of epidemic Marek's disease virus strains highly passaged on chicken embryo fibroblast].

Bing du xue bao = Chinese journal of virology·2009
Same author

Dietary fish oil n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and alpha-linolenic acid differently affect brain accretion of docosahexaenoic acid and expression of desaturases and sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1 in mice.

The Journal of nutritional biochemistry·2009
Same journal

A fair lexical decision task for monolingual and multilingual Spanish-speakers.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

Post-disaster psychological effects: identifying earthquake-induced trauma in athletes.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

On the contemporary history of learning disability identification procedures-a systematic literature review (1960-2000).

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

Adolescent Mental Toughness Questionnaire (aMTQ10): development, validation and norms.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

Understanding secondary school students' intentions to learn artificial intelligence: a multigroup structural equation modeling analysis.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

Rethinking directiveness in AI coaching chatbots.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 3, 2025

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling
06:04

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling

Published on: January 17, 2025

890

Development and Validation of the Win-Win Scale.

Shan Zhang1, Xinlei Zang1, Feng Zhang1

  • 1Institute of Psychology and Behavior, Henan University, Kaifeng, China.

Frontiers in Psychology
|June 7, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study developed and validated a win-win scale to measure mutual benefit in individuals and society. The final 16-item scale demonstrates good construct validity across five dimensions.

Keywords:
factor analysisreliabilityscale developmentvaliditywin-win

More Related Videos

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.0K
Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
10:32

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills

Published on: April 23, 2014

18.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 3, 2025

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling
06:04

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling

Published on: January 17, 2025

890
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.0K
Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
10:32

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills

Published on: April 23, 2014

18.7K

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Behavioral Science
  • Measurement Theory

Background:

  • The concept of win-win outcomes is increasingly recognized as crucial for both individual well-being and societal progress.
  • Existing measures may not adequately capture the multifaceted nature of win-win dynamics.
  • A validated scale is needed to quantitatively assess win-win principles.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a robust measurement scale for assessing win-win principles.
  • To identify the core dimensions underlying win-win interactions.
  • To provide a reliable tool for researchers studying cooperation and mutual benefit.

Main Methods:

  • Two studies were conducted for scale development and validation.
  • Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was used to identify initial dimensions and items.
  • Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), including first- and second-order models, was employed to test construct validity.

Main Results:

  • An initial 25-item scale was developed, encompassing five dimensions: integrity, advancement, altruism, harmoniousness, and coordination.
  • Confirmatory Factor Analysis supported a five-factor model, indicating good fit with the data.
  • A refined 16-item win-win scale was established based on the validation process.

Conclusions:

  • The developed 16-item win-win scale exhibits strong construct validity.
  • The scale effectively measures the five identified dimensions of win-win.
  • This validated scale can be utilized to advance research on win-win phenomena in various contexts.