Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Community Based Intervention01:30

Community Based Intervention

130
Community-based interventions in mental health represent a paradigm shift from institution-centered care to treatments embedded within the fabric of local communities. By prioritizing inclusion and leveraging existing societal structures, this approach fosters a supportive environment conducive to addressing mental health challenges while promoting individual dignity and agency.
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
130
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model01:29

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

94
The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...
94
Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

3.8K
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
3.8K
Environmental Influences on Intelligence01:29

Environmental Influences on Intelligence

557
Despite the strong genetic influence on traits like intelligence, environmental factors significantly shape outcomes. For example, while over 90% of height variation is due to genetic differences, environmental factors such as nutrition also have a notable impact. Similarly, for intelligence, changes in a child's surroundings can significantly alter their IQ. Research shows that enriched environments boost children's academic success and help them develop key cognitive skills. Children...
557
Longitudinal Research02:20

Longitudinal Research

12.8K
Sometimes we want to see how people change over time, as in studies of human development and lifespan. When we test the same group of individuals repeatedly over an extended period of time, we are conducting longitudinal research. Longitudinal research is a research design in which data-gathering is administered repeatedly over an extended period of time. For example, we may survey a group of individuals about their dietary habits at age 20, retest them a decade later at age 30, and then again...
12.8K
Gene-Environment Interactions01:20

Gene-Environment Interactions

760
Gene expression is a dynamic process that is significantly influenced by environmental factors. This interaction underlies the complex nature of biological development and the phenotypic differences observed among individuals, even among those with identical genetic makeups. Factors such as radiation, temperature, behavior, nutrition, and stress play pivotal roles in determining how genes are expressed. The concept of the reaction range is central to understanding this interaction. It posits...
760

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Feasibility and Acceptability of Collaborative Augmented Reality for Older Adults and Companions: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

JMIR research protocols·2026
Same author

Widely used but weakly studied: a research agenda for Memory Cafés.

Innovation in aging·2026
Same author

Applying the dynamic sustainability framework to evaluate the implementation of Cyber-Seniors in higher education: a qualitative interview study.

Innovation in aging·2025
Same author

A Scoping Review of Delphi Studies: Trends and Gaps in Aging Research.

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society·2025
Same author

The pain identification and communication toolkit: a training program to support family caregivers of persons with ADRD.

BMC geriatrics·2025
Same author

Pain-attributed care task difficulty among dementia caregivers with chronic pain.

Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 2, 2025

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
11:29

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools

Published on: June 20, 2020

9.4K

Increasing the Power of Intergenerational Programs: Advancing an Evaluation Tool.

Shannon E Jarrott1, Shelbie G Turner2, Jill Juris Naar3

  • 1The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA.

Journal of Applied Gerontology : the Official Journal of the Southern Gerontological Society
|June 9, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study validated the Best Practices (BP) Checklist for intergenerational programs. The analysis revealed a 13-item, 3-factor structure, improving program evaluation tools.

Keywords:
evaluationexploratory factor analysisimplementationintergenerational programintergenerational relationsquantitative methods

More Related Videos

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

4.0K
The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 2, 2025

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
11:29

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools

Published on: June 20, 2020

9.4K
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

4.0K
The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.5K

Area of Science:

  • Gerontology
  • Program Evaluation
  • Social Sciences

Background:

  • Intergenerational practitioners require evidence-informed tools to assess program effectiveness.
  • The Best Practices (BP) Checklist was developed to evaluate intergenerational program strategies.
  • Empirical validation of the BP Checklist is needed.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To begin the empirical validation of the Best Practices (BP) Checklist.
  • To explore the underlying factor structure of the BP Checklist.
  • To inform potential item reduction and refine the measure for intergenerational program evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was conducted on data from 132 intergenerational activities.
  • The 14-item Best Practices (BP) Checklist was analyzed.
  • Item data from the yes/no measure were used to identify latent factors.

Main Results:

  • A 13-item, 3-factor structure was identified for the BP Checklist.
  • The three factors represent: pairing participants, person-centered strategies, and staff knowledge.
  • This structure provides initial empirical support for the measure's latent dimensions.

Conclusions:

  • The study provides foundational validation for the Best Practices (BP) Checklist.
  • The identified factor structure aids in optimizing intergenerational program evaluation.
  • Enhanced evaluation tools can contribute to improved quality of intergenerational programming.