Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Quality factors.

G D Kerr1

  • 1Health and Safety Research Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, TN 37830.

Health Physics
|August 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The quality factor (Q) for neutrons, crucial for radiation protection, may increase by a factor of 2. This adjustment, based on substantial experimental data, aims to better reflect neutron biological effectiveness but requires further application guidance.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mortality in individuals with Type 2 diabetes and heart disease in a unique New Zealand population.

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association·2006
Same author

Patient-led variable dosing with balsalazide as long-term therapy for maintenance in ulcerative colitis: a 3-year prospective observational study.

Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics·2004
Same author

A double-blind comparison of balsalazide, 6.75 g daily, and sulfasalazine, 3 g daily, in patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed active ulcerative colitis.

Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics·2002
Same author

Maintenance of remission of ulcerative colitis: a comparison between balsalazide 3 g daily and mesalazine 1.2 g daily over 12 months. ABACUS Investigator group.

Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics·1999
Same author

Incidence of duodenal ulcer healing after 1 week of proton pump inhibitor triple therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori. The Lansoprazole Helicobacter Study Group.

Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics·1998
Same author

Effect of casemix funding on outcomes in patients admitted to hospital with suspected unstable angina.

The Medical journal of Australia·1998
Same journal

Assessment of Health Risks of Adults and Children Due to Consumption of Uranium in Groundwater from Chengalpattu District, Tamil Nadu, India.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

Radiation Protection Abstracts, Volume 46, Number 1.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

Specialized Radiological Assets for Navigable Two-dimensional and Three-dimensional Virtual and Augmented Reality.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

DoseBusters: A Fully Immersive Virtual Reality Game for Radiation Protection and Detection.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

Radioactivity in Bottled Drinking Water from Greater Dhaka City and Concomitant Ingestion Doses to Consumers.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

Assessment of Radiation Dose and Protection Practices in Neonatal Radiography in NICUs.

Health physics·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Radiation Dosimetry
  • Radiobiology
  • Radiation Protection

Background:

  • The quality factor (Q) is essential for converting absorbed dose to dose equivalent, accounting for radiation's biological impact.
  • Current Q values for neutrons have been questioned since the 1980s by NCRP and ICRP statements.
  • Previous recommendations suggested increases in neutron Q by factors of 3-10 (NCRP, 1980) and 2 (ICRP, 1985).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the adequacy of current neutron quality factor (Q) values.
  • To discuss the substantial experimental data supporting a change in neutron Q.
  • To address issues surrounding the proposed doubling of Q for neutrons and its application.

Main Methods:

  • Review of experimental data concerning neutron relative biological effectiveness (RBE) and linear energy transfer (LET).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of historical recommendations from the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) and the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP).
  • Discussion of the complexities in choosing appropriate Q values due to biological variability.

    • Main Results:

    • Both NCRP and ICRP now recommend an increase by a factor of 2 for the neutron quality factor (Q).
    • The data supporting this change in neutron Q are substantial, despite a lack of experimental focus.
    • The application of the proposed doubled neutron Q is complicated by additional unresolved issues.

    Conclusions:

    • A factor of 2 increase in the neutron quality factor (Q) is supported by a significant body of experimental evidence.
    • Further research and clarification are necessary to refine neutron Q values and their practical application in radiation protection.
    • Improvements are needed to provide better guidance for both neutron Q determination and its implementation in radiation safety protocols.