Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Industrial risk perceptions.

E E Pochin1

  • 1National Radiological Protection Board, Chilton, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom.

Health Physics
|August 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Quantifying occupational radiation risks requires comparing diverse harms like cancer and accidents. Developing criteria for detriment is essential for setting safety standards and understanding risks in industrial settings.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Distribution of radioiodide in man.

Clinical science·2014
Same author

The metabolism of radiothyroxine in man.

Clinical science·2014
Same author

Radiation and mental retardation.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·1988
Same author

Radiation risks in perspective.

The British journal of radiology·1987
Same author

The 10-day recommendation.

Clinical radiology·1986
Same author

Radiation and an index of harm.

Progress in clinical and biological research·1986
Same journal

Assessment of Health Risks of Adults and Children Due to Consumption of Uranium in Groundwater from Chengalpattu District, Tamil Nadu, India.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

Radiation Protection Abstracts, Volume 46, Number 1.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

Specialized Radiological Assets for Navigable Two-dimensional and Three-dimensional Virtual and Augmented Reality.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

DoseBusters: A Fully Immersive Virtual Reality Game for Radiation Protection and Detection.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

Radioactivity in Bottled Drinking Water from Greater Dhaka City and Concomitant Ingestion Doses to Consumers.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

Assessment of Radiation Dose and Protection Practices in Neonatal Radiography in NICUs.

Health physics·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Occupational health and safety
  • Radiation protection
  • Risk assessment

Background:

  • Occupational radiation exposure risks require better characterization and comparison with common workplace hazards.
  • Current standards lack a defined criterion for quantifying and comparing disparate harms, such as accidental death, cancer, and genetic defects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a quantitative framework for comparing diverse occupational harms.
  • To establish a criterion for assessing detriment from various health effects, including radiation exposure and workplace accidents.
  • To place occupational exposure standards into better perspective.

Main Methods:

  • Reviewing average healthy life and activity lost due to nonfatal accidents, cancers, and genetic defects.
  • Estimating life expectancy lost from fatal accidents and diseases.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparing frequencies of fatal cancers and genetic defects with accidental workplace deaths.

    • Main Results:

    • A scientifically defined criterion for comparing incommensurable harms is currently lacking but essential for risk management.
    • Estimates highlight the need for expert opinion to translate time-lost measures into perceived detriment.
    • Industrial safety standards for both accidents and radiation exposure are reviewed based on risk reduction rates.

    Conclusions:

    • Establishing a unified detriment criterion is crucial for effective occupational risk management.
    • Further research and consensus are needed to translate quantitative risk measures into acceptable safety standards.
    • Comparing radiation risks with other occupational hazards requires a robust framework for evaluating diverse health impacts.