Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Assumption of linearity in dose--effect relationships.

E E Pochin

    Environmental Health Perspectives
    |February 1, 1978
    PubMed
    Summary

    Establishing radiation protection standards relies on understanding cancer risks from radiation exposure. Current models may overestimate risks at low doses, necessitating a re-evaluation of the linear hypothesis for radiation and chemical exposure.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Distribution of radioiodide in man.

    Clinical science·2014
    Same author

    The metabolism of radiothyroxine in man.

    Clinical science·2014
    Same author

    Industrial risk perceptions.

    Health physics·1988
    Same author

    Radiation and mental retardation.

    BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·1988
    Same author

    Radiation risks in perspective.

    The British journal of radiology·1987
    Same author

    The 10-day recommendation.

    Clinical radiology·1986

    Area of Science:

    • Radiation biology
    • Toxicology
    • Epidemiology
    • Risk assessment

    Background:

    • Quantitative data exists for radiation-induced cancers at moderate to high doses, enabling whole-body and organ-specific risk estimations.
    • Epidemiological surveys do not cover cancer risks from low-dose occupational or environmental radiation exposure.
    • Current risk assessment for low-dose radiation and chemical exposure often relies on the linear hypothesis, assuming effects are proportional to dose.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the validity of the linear hypothesis in estimating risks from low-dose radiation exposure.
    • To discuss the implications of the dose-effect relationship for radiation protection standards.
    • To examine the applicability of the linear hypothesis to chemical substance risk assessment.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of existing quantitative information on radiation-induced malignant diseases.
    • Analysis of the dose-effect relationship for radiation exposure.
    • Comparison of linear hypothesis assumptions with emerging data on dose-response curves.
    • Consideration of chemical pollutant distribution and metabolism in relation to toxic effects.

    Main Results:

    • Information on the dose-effect relationship for radiation suggests the linear hypothesis may overestimate risks at low doses.
    • The linear hypothesis, when applied to chemical substances, requires critical evaluation based on toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics.
    • Accurate dose-response data is crucial for refining radiation protection standards and chemical risk assessments.

    Conclusions:

    • The linear hypothesis may lead to an overestimation of risks associated with low-dose radiation and chemical exposures.
    • Further research into the actual dose-effect relationships is needed to establish more accurate radiation protection standards.
    • The extrapolation of high-dose effects to low doses for both radiation and chemicals requires careful consideration of biological mechanisms.

    Related Experiment Videos