Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Frequency importance functions for a feature recognition test material.

V Duggirala1, G A Studebaker, C V Pavlovic

  • 1Department of Linguistics, Osmania University, Hyderabad, India.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|June 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Development of Phonetically Balanced Phrase Lists Typical of Communication in Noisy Work Environments.

American journal of audiology·2015
Same author

Efficacy of 3 commonly used hearing aid circuits: A crossover trial. NIDCD/VA Hearing Aid Clinical Trial Group.

JAMA·2000
Same author

Prediction and statistical evaluation of speech recognition test scores.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2000
Same author

A clinical trial of the ReSound IC4 hearing device.

American journal of audiology·1999
Same author

Monosyllabic word recognition at higher-than-normal speech and noise levels.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1999
Same author

Age-related changes in monosyllabic word recognition performance when audibility is held constant.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·1997
Same journal

Interaction of near-wall bubble arrays with acoustic waves induced by an oscillating rigid wall.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Ultra-broadband underwater acoustic projector based on transverse resonance orthogonal beam (TROB) mode and acoustic matching layer technique.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Fine-scale quantitative analysis of bowhead whale (Balaena mysticetus) song shows varying stability of song types.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

High-resolution depth estimation for multiple wideband sources in deep sea via sparse Bayesian learninga).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Depression markers in speech: An approach based on tract variables dynamics.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The oyster toadfish (Opsanus tau) alters active and diurnal calling amid vessel noise in New York City.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
See all related articles

The Diagnostic Rhyme Test (DRT) relies more on low frequencies than nonsense syllables for speech recognition. Different phonemes within test materials influence auditory frequency importance functions.

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Perception
  • Speech Acoustics
  • Psychoacoustics

Background:

  • Understanding the auditory spectrum's role in speech recognition is crucial for audiological assessments.
  • The Diagnostic Rhyme Test (DRT) is a common tool, but its frequency-dependent characteristics require detailed analysis.
  • Previous research on frequency importance functions often used nonsense syllables, limiting applicability to specific word lists.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the relative importance of different auditory frequency regions for the Diagnostic Rhyme Test (DRT).
  • To analyze frequency importance functions for the DRT and its six speech feature subtests.
  • To compare these functions with those derived from nonsense syllable recognition tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Three normal-hearing subjects participated in 70 experimental conditions, tested twice each.

Related Experiment Videos

  • French and Steinberg's analytical procedures were applied to derive frequency importance functions.
  • Analysis covered the frequency range from 178 Hz to 8912 Hz.

    • Main Results:

    • The DRT, as a whole, showed greater importance for low frequencies compared to nonsense syllables.
    • Frequency importance functions varied significantly across the DRT's feature subtests.
    • Subtest importance functions also differed from those of nonsense syllables and from each other.

    Conclusions:

    • Test materials with varying phoneme compositions exhibit distinct frequency importance functions.
    • The available response options appear to influence the derived importance functions.
    • Findings highlight the need for frequency-specific considerations when interpreting DRT results and developing speech tests.