Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:

Correlation and Causation

Correlation and Causation

Statistical tests can calculate whether there is a relationship, or correlation, between independent and dependent variables. An indirect relationship of the variables signifies a correlation, while a direct relationship shows causation. If it is determined that no connection exists between the variables, then the correlation is a coincidence.
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...

Scientific Laws and Theories

Scientific Laws and Theories

Scientific Laws

Deductive Reasoning

Deductive Reasoning

Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Building compressed causal models of the world.

Cognitive psychology·2024

Same author

Tell me your (cognitive) budget, and I'll tell you what you value.

Cognition·2024

Same journal

Transferring ways of thinking and mathematizing: The statistical approach between physics and biology.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026

Same journal

The Dynamics of Quantum Gravity: The Missing Piece in the Spacetime Emergentist Account.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026

Same journal

A frame-based approach for reconstructing theories.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026

Same journal

Strategic ignorance, and the management of performative effects: Lessons from climate economics.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026

Same journal

Fictionalism and scientific realism: A response to ungrounded criticism.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026

Same journal

Is Emergy really a theory of value ?

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 2, 2025

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: August 7, 2017

Curie's principle and causal graphs.

¹Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM, 87501, USA.

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science

|June 10, 2021

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Graphical causal models do not always uphold Curie's Principle. Depending on the symmetry definition, the framework either contradicts or supports this principle, clarifying their relationship.

Keywords:

Causal graphs Causation Curie’s Principle Markov condition Symmetry

More Related Videos

A Knowledge Graph Approach to Elucidate the Role of Organellar Pathways in Disease via Biomedical Reports

A Knowledge Graph Approach to Elucidate the Role of Organellar Pathways in Disease via Biomedical Reports

Published on: October 13, 2023

Gene Digital Circuits Based on CRISPR-Cas Systems and Anti-CRISPR Proteins

Gene Digital Circuits Based on CRISPR-Cas Systems and Anti-CRISPR Proteins

Published on: October 18, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 2, 2025

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: August 7, 2017

A Knowledge Graph Approach to Elucidate the Role of Organellar Pathways in Disease via Biomedical Reports

A Knowledge Graph Approach to Elucidate the Role of Organellar Pathways in Disease via Biomedical Reports

Published on: October 13, 2023

Gene Digital Circuits Based on CRISPR-Cas Systems and Anti-CRISPR Proteins

Gene Digital Circuits Based on CRISPR-Cas Systems and Anti-CRISPR Proteins

Published on: October 18, 2022

Area of Science:

Causal inference
Philosophy of science
Symmetry principles

Background:

Curie's Principle posits that the symmetry of a cause must be reflected in its effect.
Understanding this principle is crucial in various scientific disciplines.
Graphical causal models offer a formal framework for analyzing causal relationships.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the relationship between Curie's Principle and graphical causal models.
To determine if graphical causal models necessitate Curie's Principle.
To explore different definitions of symmetry transformations within causal modeling.

Main Methods:

Analysis of Curie's Principle within the framework of graphical causal models.
Examination of two distinct definitions of symmetry transformations.
Logical deduction of implications for Curie's Principle based on the causal modeling formalism.

Main Results:

Under one definition, graphical causal models do not require Curie's Principle.
Under an alternative definition, the graphical causal modeling formalism implies a version of Curie's Principle.
The study clarifies the logical landscape concerning Curie's Principle and graphical causal models.

Conclusions:

The adherence of graphical causal models to Curie's Principle is definition-dependent.
This research refines the understanding of symmetry in causal inference.
The findings contribute to the theoretical foundations of causal reasoning.