PPalign: optimal alignment of Potts models representing proteins with direct coupling information.
Hugo Talibart1, François Coste2
1Univ Rennes, Inria, CNRS, IRISA, Rennes, France. hugo.talibart@irisa.fr.
BMC Bioinformatics
|June 11, 2021
Summary
We developed PPalign, a novel method using Potts models to align protein sequences by considering residue coevolution. This approach improves remote homology detection, outperforming existing methods in certain cases.
Area of Science:
- Computational Biology
- Bioinformatics
- Structural Biology
Background:
- Protein annotation relies on homology search methods like BLAST and profile Hidden Markov Models.
- Current methods do not account for coevolutionary information between amino acid residues.
- Advances in contact prediction enable new modeling approaches for protein sequences.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a novel method for aligning protein sequences that incorporates coevolutionary information.
- To represent proteins using Potts models, which capture direct couplings between positions.
- To computationally address the challenge of aligning these complex Potts models.
Main Methods:
- Formulated the Potts model alignment problem using Integer Linear Programming.
- Developed PPalign, a program implementing this formulation for optimal pairwise alignment.
- Assessed PPalign performance on low-sequence-identity alignments from the SISYPHUS benchmark.
Main Results:
- PPalign successfully aligns Potts models in tractable time, averaging [Formula: see text] per alignment.
- The method demonstrates improved alignment accuracy compared to HHalign and PPalign without couplings.
- PPalign achieved better mean [Formula: see text] scores, particularly for distantly related sequences.
Conclusions:
- Pairwise couplings from protein Potts models enhance the alignment of remotely related sequences.
- Further research is needed to optimize Potts model inference for homology search.
- PPalign offers a robust tool for investigating Potts models and improving protein sequence alignment.
Related Concept Videos
Protein-protein Interfaces
14.1K
Many proteins form complexes to carry out their functions, making protein-protein interactions (PPIs) essential for an organism's survival. Most PPIs are stabilized by numerous weak noncovalent chemical forces. The physical shape of the interfaces determines the way two proteins interact. Many globular proteins have closely-matching shapes on their surfaces, which form a large number of weak bonds. Additionally, many PPIs occur between two helices or between a surface cleft and a...
14.1K
Protein-Protein Interfaces
4.1K
4.1K
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions
8.3K
Cooperative allosteric transitions can occur in multimeric proteins, where each subunit of the protein has its own ligand-binding site. When a ligand binds to any of these subunits, it triggers a conformational change that affects the binding sites in the other subunits; this can change the affinity of the other sites for their respective ligands. The ability of the protein to change the shape of its binding site is attributed to the presence of a mix of flexible and stable segments in the...
8.3K
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions
2.5K
2.5K
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions
2.7K
2.7K
Conserved Binding Sites
4.7K
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
4.7K


