Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 2, 2025

Cortical Bone Assessment Using Ultrasonic Guided Waves: A Reproducibility Study in a Healthy Population
Published on: January 31, 2025
Inter- and intraobserver reproducibility of Strain and 2D Shear Wave Elastography - a phantom study
Marina Dudea-Simon1, Sorin Marian Dudea2, Călin Schiau3
1"Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. marina.dudea@gmail.com.
Strain elastography and Shear Wave Elastography show good reproducibility. Smaller regions of interest (ROI) improve strain ratio reproducibility, while Shear Wave Elastography requires significant stiffness differences for reliable interobserver results.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Ultrasound Technology
- Elastography
Background:
- Elastography techniques quantify tissue stiffness using ultrasound.
- Variability in elastographic measurements can impact diagnostic accuracy.
- Standardization of elastography protocols is crucial for reliable clinical application.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze intra- and interobserver variability of two elastographic quantification methods.
- To identify technical factors influencing variability, including machine type and region of interest (ROI) size.
- To compare variability between two different ultrasound machines in an in vitro setting.
Main Methods:
- Three silicone experimental devices (ED) were used for in vitro testing.
- Two observers performed repeated measurements using strain elastography and Shear Wave Elastography (SWE) on two ultrasound machines.
- Reproducibility was assessed using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs) based on ROI size and stiffness differences.
Main Results:
- Strain elastography demonstrated high inter- and intraobserver reproducibility across both machines.
- A smaller ROI diameter (5 mm) significantly increased strain ratio reproducibility compared to a larger diameter (15 mm) (ICC = 0.87 vs 0.78).
- SWE achieved significant interobserver reproducibility only when analyzing structures with substantial stiffness differences (ICC = 0.75).
Conclusions:
- Both strain elastography and SWE are reproducible techniques for quantifying tissue stiffness.
- Utilizing a smaller ROI diameter enhances interobserver reproducibility in strain elastography.
- SWE's reproducibility is contingent upon significant differences in tissue hardness.
More Related Videos
09:32Manufacturing Abdominal Aorta Hydrogel Tissue-Mimicking Phantoms for Ultrasound Elastography Validation
Published on: September 19, 2018
07:57Viscoelastic Characterization of Soft Tissue-Mimicking Gelatin Phantoms using Indentation and Magnetic Resonance Elastography
Published on: May 10, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Elastic Strain Energy for Shearing Stresses
Measurements of Strain
Strain and Elastic Modulus
Shearing Strain