Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 2, 2025

Use of MRI-ultrasound Fusion to Achieve Targeted Prostate Biopsy
Published on: April 9, 2019
Optimal Method for Reporting Prostate Cancer Grade in MRI-targeted Biopsies
Fang-Ming Deng1,2, Bogdan Isaila1, Derek Jones1
1Departments of Pathology.
Reporting aggregated Gleason Grade Group (GG) from MRI-targeted prostate biopsies shows better agreement with radical prostatectomy findings than individual core grading. This global GG approach is recommended for pathology reports.
Area of Science:
- Urologic Oncology
- Pathology Reporting
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Assigning Gleason Grade Group (GG) for MRI-targeted prostate lesions can vary, using individual cores or aggregate data.
- Discrepancies in GG assignment may impact treatment decisions and patient outcomes.
- Optimal pathology reporting methods for MRI-targeted lesions require validation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the concordance of biopsy Gleason Grade Group (GG) with radical prostatectomy (RP) GG for MRI-targeted lesions.
- To evaluate three methods of GG assignment: global (aggregate), highest, and largest volume core.
- To determine the most accurate method for pathology reporting of MRI-targeted prostate biopsies.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 317 patients with 367 MRI-targeted lesions undergoing biopsy followed by radical prostatectomy (RP).
- Targeted lesion GG assigned using global (aggregated positive cores), highest GG (single core), and largest volume GG (longest cancer linear length).
- Comparison of biopsy GG with final RP GG using kappa (κ) and weighted kappa coefficients.
Main Results:
- Global GG showed the highest concordance with RP GG (73%, weighted κ: 0.77), followed by highest GG (68%, weighted κ: 0.79) and largest volume GG (62%, weighted κ: 0.71).
- When biopsy GG scores differed, global GG concordance with RP GG was 69% (weighted κ: 0.65), significantly higher than highest (52%, weighted κ: 0.68) or largest volume GG (31%, weighted κ: 0.59).
- Global GG demonstrated substantial agreement with RP-targeted lesion GG, outperforming other methods, especially when biopsy scores varied.
Conclusions:
- Global (aggregate) Gleason Grade Group assignment for MRI-targeted prostate biopsies shows superior agreement with radical prostatectomy findings.
- The global GG method is recommended for pathology reporting of MRI-targeted biopsies, offering more reliable grading.
- Further validation studies are warranted to solidify the clinical application of global GG reporting.
More Related Videos
06:08A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
Published on: March 21, 2025
05:49Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biopsy Data to Guide Sampling Procedures for Prostate Cancer Biobanking
Published on: October 10, 2019