Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluating a pediatric trauma program: effectiveness versus preventable death rate.

D E Wesson1, J I Williams, L R Salmi

  • 1Department of Surgery, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

The Journal of Trauma
|August 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Evaluation of the effects of a complex intervention].

Revue d'epidemiologie et de sante publique·2022
Same author

Editorial.

Revue d'epidemiologie et de sante publique·2018
Same author

Research abstracts presented at the Eastern Allergy Conference, Palm Beach, Florida, May 6-9, 2010.

Allergy and asthma proceedings·2017
Same author

Abstracts from the North American Rhinology & Allergy Conference, February 3, 2011, Puerto Rico.

American journal of rhinology & allergy·2017
Same author

A Cost-Utility Analysis of Sacral Anterior Root Stimulation (SARS) Compared to Medical Treatment in Complete Spinal Cord Injured Patients with a Neurological Bladder.

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2016
Same author

Initial experience with one-stage endorectal pull-through procedures for Hirschsprung's disease.

Pediatric surgery international·2013
Same journal

Article.

The Journal of trauma·2014
Same journal

Article.

The Journal of trauma·2014
Same journal

Program schedule for the sixty-fifth annual meeting of the american association for the surgery of trauma.

The Journal of trauma·2014
Same journal

Letters to the editor.

The Journal of trauma·2014
Same journal

Posttraumatic brachial plexitis.

The Journal of trauma·2011
Same journal

Incidental findings in focused assessment with sonography for trauma in hemodynamically stable blunt trauma patients: speaking about cost to benefit.

The Journal of trauma·2011
See all related articles

Effectiveness (E) better assesses trauma program quality than preventable death rate (PDR). PDR is sensitive to patient case mix, not just care quality, impacting its reliability for evaluating trauma outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Trauma surgery
  • Medical quality assessment
  • Public health

Background:

  • Evaluating trauma care quality is crucial for improving patient outcomes.
  • Effectiveness (E) and preventable death rate (PDR) are metrics used to assess trauma program performance.
  • Understanding the limitations of each metric is essential for accurate evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effectiveness (E) and preventable death rate (PDR) in assessing trauma program performance over three years.
  • To determine which metric, E or PDR, is more reliable for evaluating trauma care quality.
  • To investigate the influence of patient case mix on PDR calculations.

Main Methods:

  • Severely injured patients (Abbreviated Injury Score >= 4) were categorized as salvageable or nonsalvageable.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Effectiveness (E) was calculated as the proportion of salvageable patients who survived.
  • Preventable Death Rate (PDR) was calculated over three consecutive 1-year periods, analyzing deaths among salvageable patients.

    • Main Results:

    • No significant difference in Effectiveness (E) was observed across the three study years.
    • Preventable Death Rate (PDR) appeared to improve, but this was due to an increase in deaths among nonsalvageable patients.
    • The number of deaths among salvageable patients decreased over the study period.

    Conclusions:

    • Effectiveness (E) provides a more stable and reliable measure of trauma program quality than PDR.
    • Preventable Death Rate (PDR) is significantly influenced by patient case mix, limiting its utility as a sole quality indicator.
    • Trauma program assessment should prioritize metrics like E that are less susceptible to variations in patient severity.