Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 2, 2025

Whole Genome Sequencing of Candida glabrata for Detection of Markers of Antifungal Drug Resistance
Published on: December 28, 2017
Molecular identification, virulence factors and antifungal susceptibility patterns of Candida parapsilosis complex
N Cakir1, M A Atalay1, A N Koc1
1Department of Medical Microbiology, School of Medicine, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.
Aims:
The aim of this study was to identify C. parapsilosis complex strains isolated from various clinical samples by sequence analysis and to investigate whether there are any differences between the species in terms of virulence factors and antifungal susceptibility.
Methods:
The study included a total of 42 isolates identified as C. parapsilosis complex based on the color they formed in chromogenic medium, colony morphology, and microscopic appearance in Corn Meal-Tween 80 Agar and they were confirmed with API 20 C AUX. For the DNA sequence analysis of clinical isolates, V9G forward and LS reverse primers were used as well as internal transcribed spacers (ITS1 and ITS4). Biofilm formation, esterase, phospholipase, and protease activities were evaluated as virulence factors. Antifungal susceptibility was investigated via colorimetric microdilution method.
Results:
A total of 75 non-C. albicans isolates were obtained from various clinical samples between 2016 and 2017 in a Turkish Tertiary Care Hospital. Of them, 42 were identified as members of the C. parapsilosis complex. Of the 42 strains, 41 were identified as C. parapsilosis sensu stricto (CpSS), while only one was identified as C. orthopsilosis. Of the CpSS strains, 31 (75.6%) were biofilm-positive, six (14.6%) were esterase-positive, nine (21.9%) were positive for phospholipase activity, and 31 (75.6%) were positive for protease formation, whereas all virulence factors of C. orthopsilosis strain were found to be negative. All CpSS strains were found susceptible to amphotericin B, echinocandins, and flucytosine.
Conclusions:
It has been concluded that the use of molecular methods to identify CpSS would not be effective in routine laboratory practices as it is the most commonly isolated species from the C. parapsilosis complex and there are no significant differences between species in terms of antifungal susceptibility.
Insights
Candida parapsilosis sensu stricto (CpSS) is the most common species in the C. parapsilosis complex. Molecular identification of CpSS is not essential for routine labs due to similar antifungal susceptibility across species.
Area of Science:
- Medical Mycology
- Clinical Microbiology
- Molecular Diagnostics
Background:
- The Candida parapsilosis complex is a significant cause of fungal infections.
- Accurate identification of species within this complex is crucial for understanding pathogenicity and guiding treatment.
- Virulence factors and antifungal susceptibility can vary among Candida species.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify Candida parapsilosis complex strains using sequence analysis.
- To compare virulence factors and antifungal susceptibility between different species within the complex.
- To evaluate the utility of molecular methods for routine identification.
Main Methods:
- 42 Candida parapsilosis complex isolates were identified using chromogenic medium, morphology, and API 20 C AUX.
- DNA sequence analysis of internal transcribed spacers (ITS1 and ITS4) was performed.
- Virulence factors (biofilm, esterase, phospholipase, protease) and antifungal susceptibility were assessed.
Main Results:
- 41 of 42 isolates were identified as Candida parapsilosis sensu stricto (CpSS), and one as Candida orthopsilosis.
- CpSS strains frequently exhibited biofilm, esterase, phospholipase, and protease activities.
- All CpSS strains were susceptible to amphotericin B, echinocandins, and flucytosine; C. orthopsilosis showed no virulence factors.
Conclusions:
- Candida parapsilosis sensu stricto is the predominant species in the C. parapsilosis complex.
- Molecular identification of CpSS may not be necessary for routine diagnostics due to consistent antifungal susceptibility profiles.
- No significant differences in antifungal susceptibility were observed between the identified species.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Modern Molecular Taxonomy
Applications of Molecular Taxonomy
Methods of Classification and Identification

