Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 2, 2025

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
Published on: January 15, 2017
Exploring the Association Between USMLE Scores and ACGME Milestone Ratings: A Validity Study Using National Data From
Stanley J Hamstra1, Monica M Cuddy2, Daniel Jurich3
1S.J. Hamstra was vice president, Milestones Research and Evaluation, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, Chicago, Illinois, at the time of writing, and is now professor, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and adjunct professor, Department of Medical Education, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0680-366X .
The United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 and Step 2 CK scores show small, significant associations with Emergency Medicine (EM) milestone ratings, supporting their use in graduate medical education assessment.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education Assessment
- Graduate Medical Training Evaluation
- Physician Competency Measurement
Background:
- The United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) milestones are key components of medical education assessment.
- Evaluating the association between standardized test scores and competency-based milestones is crucial for refining assessment strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the relationship between USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) scores and ACGME Emergency Medicine (EM) milestone ratings.
- To provide validity evidence for the use of USMLE scores in assessing EM resident performance.
Main Methods:
- Subject matter experts (SMEs) identified expected associations between USMLE scores and EM subcompetencies.
- National-level data from 6,618 EM residents (2013-2018) were analyzed using bivariate correlations and multilevel regression.
- Empirical correlations were compared against SME judgments for convergent and discriminant validity.
Main Results:
- Step 2 CK scores demonstrated small but statistically significant positive relationships with most EM subcompetencies, aligning with SME predictions for 7 of 9 subcompetencies.
- A 1-SD increase in Step 2 CK score predicted a 0.12 increase in the MK-01 milestone rating, controlling for Step 1.
- Step 1 scores showed a statistically significant, albeit small, association only with the MK-01 subcompetency.
Conclusions:
- The findings offer incremental validity evidence supporting the use of USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 CK scores in conjunction with EM milestone ratings.
- These results reinforce the utility of standardized examinations in the continuum of medical education assessment.
Related Concept Videos
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Ratio Level of Measurement
A set of data measured using the ratio scale takes care of the ratio problem and provides complete information. Ratio scale data are like interval scale data, except they have a zero point and ratios can be calculated....

