Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Systemic α₂-agonist use and lower hazard of glaucoma compared with β-blockers: a cohort study.

BMJ open ophthalmology·2026
Same author

A Rare Case of Concurrent Carotid Cavernous Fistula and Orbital Cellulitis: Challenging Diagnosis and Divergent Management.

Case reports in ophthalmology·2026
Same author

PyOPV: An Open-Source Python Package for Ophthalmic Visual Field Data Management.

Journal of glaucoma·2026
Same author

Dual-Level Pattern Tree for Visual Field Improves Glaucoma Progression and Polygenic Risk Prediction.

Translational vision science & technology·2025
Same author

Large Planum Sphenoidale Meningioma in a Patient with Bilateral Optic Disc Pallor.

Case reports in ophthalmology·2025
Same author

The Impact of Myopia on Regional Visual Field Loss and Progression in Glaucoma.

Translational vision science & technology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 1, 2025

Author Spotlight: Insights into Visual Cortex Research Through Wide-View fMRI Mapping
07:11

Author Spotlight: Insights into Visual Cortex Research Through Wide-View fMRI Mapping

Published on: December 8, 2023

2.0K

Development and Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms to Determine Visual Field Progression.

Osamah Saeedi1, Michael V Boland2, Loris D'Acunto3

  • 1University of Maryland Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Translational Vision Science & Technology
|June 22, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Machine learning classifiers (MLCs) accurately determine visual field progression. These novel algorithms are more balanced than traditional methods, offering improved diagnostic potential for eye conditions.

More Related Videos

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

635
Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
07:11

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential

Published on: May 25, 2020

6.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 1, 2025

Author Spotlight: Insights into Visual Cortex Research Through Wide-View fMRI Mapping
07:11

Author Spotlight: Insights into Visual Cortex Research Through Wide-View fMRI Mapping

Published on: December 8, 2023

2.0K
Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

635
Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
07:11

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential

Published on: May 25, 2020

6.5K

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Medical Technology
  • Data Science

Background:

  • Visual field progression is a key indicator of glaucoma severity and disease advancement.
  • Accurate detection of visual field progression is crucial for timely treatment adjustments and patient management.
  • Conventional algorithms for visual field progression analysis can exhibit bias in classifying uncertain cases.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate machine learning classifiers (MLCs) for the accurate determination of visual field progression.
  • To compare the performance of MLCs against established progression algorithms using a large dataset.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized 90,713 visual fields from 13,156 eyes for training and testing MLCs.
  • Applied six conventional algorithms and six MLCs (logistic regression, random forest, XGBoost, SVC, CNN, FCNN).
  • Input data for MLCs involved averaging visual field locations over time in the first and second halves of the study period.

Main Results:

  • MLCs demonstrated performance metrics comparable to conventional algorithms, with accuracy ranging from 87% to 91%.
  • MLCs achieved sensitivity between 0.83-0.88 and specificity between 0.92-0.96.
  • Unlike conventional algorithms which showed significant class bias, MLCs were balanced in classifying uncertain cases (P ≥ 0.08).

Conclusions:

  • Machine learning classifiers exhibit moderate to high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in determining visual field progression.
  • MLCs provide a more balanced approach to classifying uncertain visual field changes compared to traditional methods.
  • MLCs hold promise as a valuable tool for improving the assessment of visual field progression in clinical practice.