Macroscopic and microscopic evidence of prosthetic fixation with porous-coated materials

The host response to porous-coated prostheses appears favorable; there is little evidence of any adverse tissue response or significant osteoclastic activity except in grossly loose specimens. While the nature of retrieval specimens makes any statistical correlation problematic, some generalizations can be made. Femoral hip prostheses are most likely to present bone ingrowth along the lateral quadrant of their porous coating. The frequency of bone ingrowth of femoral components was nearly twice that of acetabular devices. Pore size, geometry, and porous-coating composition did not appear to influence the appearance of bone and fibrous tissue ingrowth. Direct bonding of bone to the uncoated portion of the prosthesis was rarely seen and occurred only in closest proximity to the porous-coated regions. Indications of pain and looseness are evidence that fibrous tissue ingrowth alone is not always sufficient to ensure stability. Additionally, some bone-ingrown prostheses were retrieved because of pain, which leads to the conclusion that local bone ingrowth cannot ensure a general freedom from pain, especially with partially coated prostheses. Bone and fibrous tissue response to the porous coatings generally consists of interdigitation, while the response to uncoated regions is fibrous tissue encapsulation. Burnishing the distal tips of many of the partially coated femoral prostheses is an indication of relative motion in that region, which may be a potential source of pain.