[Second chance for renal artery denervation]

A G Chepurnoĭ1, Z Kh Shugushev1, D A Maksimkin1

  • 1Cardiovascular Surgery Department, People's Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russia.

Insights

This review examines randomized studies on radiofrequency denervation for renal arteries, assessing its pros and cons for treating resistant hypertension.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Nephrology

Background:

  • Resistant arterial hypertension poses a significant clinical challenge.
  • Endovascular therapies are evolving for managing difficult-to-treat hypertension.
  • Renal sympathetic nerve activity plays a role in blood pressure regulation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and critically assess contemporary randomized studies on radiofrequency denervation of renal arteries.
  • To evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of this endovascular treatment.
  • To identify potential optimizations for the management of resistant arterial hypertension.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
  • Critical appraisal of study methodologies and outcomes.
  • Analysis of efficacy, safety, and patient selection criteria.

Main Results:

  • Radiofrequency denervation shows variable efficacy in reducing blood pressure in resistant hypertension.
  • Potential benefits include improved hemodynamic parameters and reduced medication burden.
  • Adverse events are generally infrequent but require careful monitoring.

Conclusions:

  • Radiofrequency denervation is a promising endovascular option for select patients with resistant hypertension.
  • Further research is needed to refine patient selection and optimize procedural techniques.
  • Long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness require continued investigation.