Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 31, 2025

A Telemetric, Gravimetric Platform for Real-Time Physiological Phenotyping of Plant–Environment Interactions
Published on: August 5, 2020
Mesophyll conductance variability of rice aquaporin knockout lines at different growth stages and growing
Xianhong Huang1, Zhixin Wang1, Jianliang Huang1
1National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, MOA Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River, College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430070, China.
Abstract:
The plasma membrane subfamily of aquaporins [plasma membrane intrinsic proteins (PIPs)], which facilitates the CO2 diffusion across membranes, is proposed to play an important role in mesophyll conductance to CO2 (gm ), a major limiting factor of photosynthesis. However, recent studies implied no causal relationship between gm and PIPs because they failed to repeat the previous observed differences in gm between PIP knockout lines and their wild-type. The contrasting results on the role of PIPs in gm were interpreted as the different growth conditions among studies, which has never been tested. Here, we assessed whether the differences in gm between wild-type and PIP knockout lines, Ospip1;1, Ospip1;2 and Ospip2;1, varied with growth condition (field versus pot condition) and growth stages in rice. Under field conditions, no differences were observed in plant performance, photosynthetic rate (A) and gm between PIP knockout lines and the wild-type. However, in agreement with previous studies, two out of three knockout lines showed significant declines in tiller number, plant height, A and gm under pot conditions. Moreover, we found that the differences in A and gm between PIP knockout lines and the wild-type varied with the growth stage of the plants. Our results showed that the differences in gm between PIP knockout lines and wild-type were depending on the growth environments and stage of the plants, and further efforts are required to reveal the underlying mechanisms.
More Related Videos
14:20Measuring the Osmotic Water Permeability Coefficient Pf of Spherical Cells: Isolated Plant Protoplasts as an Example
Published on: October 8, 2014
12:11Measurement of Leaf Hydraulic Conductance and Stomatal Conductance and Their Responses to Irradiance and Dehydration Using the Evaporative Flux Method EFM
Published on: December 31, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Responses to Drought and Flooding
Adaptations that Reduce Water Loss
Regulation of Transpiration by Stomata
Responses to Salt Stress
Responses to Heat and Cold Stress
Light Acquisition