Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Hearing01:31

Hearing

54.6K
When we hear a sound, our nervous system is detecting sound waves—pressure waves of mechanical energy traveling through a medium. The frequency of the wave is perceived as pitch, while the amplitude is perceived as loudness.
54.6K
Auditory Pathway01:15

Auditory Pathway

6.2K
Auditory pathways constitute the complex neural circuits responsible for transmitting and interpreting auditory information from the peripheral auditory system to the brain. Sound waves are initially captured by the outer ear, funneled through the ear canal, and reach the tympanic membrane (eardrum). These vibrations are transmitted via the middle ear's ossicles to the inner ear's cochlea.
When viewed cross-sectionally, the cochlea reveals the scala vestibuli and scala tympani flanking...
6.2K
Auditory Perception01:17

Auditory Perception

708
The auditory system is essential for sound perception, utilizing various critical structures. When sound waves enter the outer ear, they travel through the ear canal and cause the eardrum to vibrate. These vibrations are then transmitted to the middle ear, where three tiny bones – the malleus, incus, and stapes – amplify the sound. This amplification is crucial, as it ensures that the sound vibrations are strong enough to be conveyed to the inner ear. These vibrations then reach the...
708
Action Potential01:14

Action Potential

9.7K
Neurons communicate by firing action potentials—the electrochemical signal that is propagated along the axon. The signal results in the release of neurotransmitters at axon terminals, thereby transmitting information to the nervous system. An action potential is a specific "all-or-none" change in membrane potential that results in a rapid spike in voltage.
Membrane potential in neurons
Neurons typically have a resting membrane potential of about -70 millivolts (mV). When they receive...
9.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sensory Experience and Motor Signals Shape Auditory Processing in an Independent Manner.

The European journal of neuroscience·2026
Same author

Challenges and Methods in Annotating Natural Speech for Neurolinguistic Research.

Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025
Same author

Attention Modulation to Linguistic Speech Units.

Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025
Same author

Neural Speech Tracking during Selective Attention: A Spatially Realistic Audiovisual Study.

eNeuro·2025
Same author

Selective attention and sensitivity to auditory disturbances in a virtually real classroom.

eLife·2025
Same author

Hippocampal-entorhinal cognitive maps and cortical motor system represent action plans and their outcomes.

Nature communications·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 31, 2025

Combined Shuttle-Box Training with Electrophysiological Cortex Recording and Stimulation as a Tool to Study Perception and Learning
08:43

Combined Shuttle-Box Training with Electrophysiological Cortex Recording and Stimulation as a Tool to Study Perception and Learning

Published on: October 22, 2015

10.5K

Action-locked Neural Responses in Auditory Cortex to Self-generated Sounds.

Daniel Reznik1, Noa Guttman2, Batel Buaron3

  • 1Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Psychology Department, Leipzig, 04103, Germany.

Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)
|June 29, 2021
PubMed
Summary

This study investigates how the human brain processes sounds created by our own movements compared to sounds occurring independently. By using brain imaging, researchers found that the auditory cortex shows specific activity patterns triggered by actions that lead to sounds, suggesting the brain prepares for self-made noise.

Keywords:
MEGauditory perceptionmotor-sensory interactionsvoluntary actionssensory perceptionmotor signalsefferent pathwaysauditory detection

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

A Protocol for the Administration of Real-Time fMRI Neurofeedback Training
07:05

A Protocol for the Administration of Real-Time fMRI Neurofeedback Training

Published on: August 24, 2017

11.2K
Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach
10:50

Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach

Published on: June 6, 2012

14.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 31, 2025

Combined Shuttle-Box Training with Electrophysiological Cortex Recording and Stimulation as a Tool to Study Perception and Learning
08:43

Combined Shuttle-Box Training with Electrophysiological Cortex Recording and Stimulation as a Tool to Study Perception and Learning

Published on: October 22, 2015

10.5K
A Protocol for the Administration of Real-Time fMRI Neurofeedback Training
07:05

A Protocol for the Administration of Real-Time fMRI Neurofeedback Training

Published on: August 24, 2017

11.2K
Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach
10:50

Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach

Published on: June 6, 2012

14.7K

Area of Science:

  • Auditory neuroscience research within sensory perception
  • Magnetoencephalography applications in action-locked neural responses

Background:

No prior work had resolved the exact neurophysiological signature of how voluntary movements influence sensory cortex activity. Prior research has shown that perception varies depending on whether a stimulus arises from an external source or internal action. That uncertainty drove interest in how motor signals communicate upcoming sensory events to the brain. It was already known that sensory-evoked responses are modulated by the origin of the stimulus across various species. This gap motivated a deeper look into the relationship between motor-driven signals and auditory perception. Researchers have long suspected that efferent pathways convey information about impending sensory consequences to relevant cortical regions. However, the specific mechanisms underlying these action-locked modulations remained poorly defined in humans. This study addresses the ambiguity surrounding how the brain distinguishes self-generated sounds from externally triggered auditory events.

Purpose Of The Study:

This study aims to clarify the neurophysiological signature of action-locked modulations within the human auditory cortex. The researchers sought to determine how voluntary actions influence the processing of subsequent sensory consequences. A significant problem in the field involves distinguishing between motor-related signals and purely auditory-evoked responses. This uncertainty motivated the team to investigate whether the brain prepares for sounds generated by the organism itself. The investigators hypothesized that efferent signals convey information about upcoming sensory events to sensory regions. They aimed to decouple these signals from the actual sound onset using specific temporal delays. By comparing voluntary button presses with visual cues, the team explored the specificity of these neural responses. This research addresses the fundamental question of how internal states modulate sensory perception during active behavior.

Main Methods:

The research team employed a controlled auditory detection task involving 16 healthy participants. This design required subjects to respond to faint tones triggered by either voluntary button presses or visual cues. The investigators utilized Magnetoencephalography to record high-resolution neurophysiological data throughout the experiment. A constant temporal delay was implemented between the trigger and the sound to separate distinct neural components. The team applied source-level analysis to isolate activity specifically within the auditory cortex. This approach allowed for the decoupling of action-locked signals from those associated with the sound itself. The experimental protocol compared self-generated sound conditions against passive visual-cue conditions to identify unique neural signatures. This rigorous review approach ensured that only signals directly related to the action-sound coupling were analyzed.

Main Results:

The strongest finding indicates that action-locked evoked-responses occur in the auditory cortex following sound-triggering actions but before sound onset. These specific responses were absent when button presses were not coupled with auditory consequences. Furthermore, the researchers observed no such evoked-responses when sounds followed a predictive visual cue. The data demonstrate that the brain distinguishes between voluntary actions and external triggers through distinct efferent signaling. Source-level analysis confirmed that these signals are localized within the auditory cortex rather than general motor areas. The study provides evidence that these neural signatures are unique to the predictive nature of self-generated sounds. These findings highlight a clear difference in how the auditory system handles self-initiated versus externally driven stimuli. The results suggest that the human brain actively prepares for sensory outcomes linked to voluntary movement.

Conclusions:

The authors propose that the auditory cortex receives specific efferent signals linked to voluntary actions with future auditory consequences. This synthesis suggests that the brain actively predicts sensory outcomes before they occur. The findings imply that these neural responses are unique to action-sound pairings rather than simple motor activity. The researchers suggest that visual cues do not trigger the same preparatory cortical activity as voluntary button presses. This review of the evidence highlights the specialized nature of motor-sensory integration in the human brain. The authors conclude that these action-locked responses represent a mechanism for sensory modulation during self-initiated behaviors. The study provides a framework for understanding how internal states influence the processing of environmental stimuli. These results clarify the role of efferent signaling in shaping auditory perception during active engagement with the world.

The researchers propose that action-locked evoked-responses in the auditory cortex occur after sound-triggering actions but before the actual sound onset. This mechanism suggests the brain generates preparatory signals specifically when a voluntary movement is linked to a future auditory consequence.

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) served as the primary tool for recording neurophysiological responses. This technology allowed the team to perform source-level analysis, which was necessary to isolate activity within the auditory cortex from other brain regions during the auditory detection task.

A constant temporal delay between the button press and the tone delivery was necessary to decouple action-locked activity from auditory-locked activity. This technical requirement allowed the researchers to distinguish between signals related to the movement itself and those triggered by the sound.

The study utilized behavioral responses from 16 healthy subjects performing an auditory detection task. This data type was essential to correlate neural activity with the subjects' ability to perceive faint tones under different trigger conditions.

The researchers measured evoked-responses in the auditory cortex. They observed these specific neural patterns only when button presses were coupled with sounds, contrasting this with button presses that occurred without sounds or sounds following visual cues.

The authors propose that their findings provide evidence for efferent signals in the human auditory cortex. They suggest these signals are specifically locked to voluntary actions that have predictable auditory consequences, distinguishing them from passive sensory processing.