Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 31, 2025
Recognition of Epidermal Transglutaminase by IgA and Tissue Transglutaminase 2 Antibodies in a Rare Case of Rhesus Dermatitis
Published on: December 15, 2011
Clue of Diagnosis for Autoimmune Gastritis
Toshihiro Nishizawa1,2, Shuntaro Yoshida1,3, Hidenobu Watanabe4
1Gastroenterology, Toyoshima Endoscopy Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.
Background:
The diagnostic clues for autoimmune gastritis (AIG) can be classified into 2 categories: endoscopic findings and pathological diagnosis. We believe that research on the AIG detection rate by endoscopists could provide a better understanding of the diagnosis of AIG. This study aimed to clarify the ratio of the endoscopic and the pathological diagnoses of AIG.
Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). During their first EGD, the gastric mucosa with C2 atrophy or more was biopsied for pathological evaluation based on the updated Sydney system. A gastric biopsy was also performed after Helicobacter pylori eradication, obtaining specimens from at least 2 sites, the greater curvature of the corpus and the antrum. We enrolled patients who were positive for the anti-parietal cell antibody and were diagnosed with AIG, histologically and/or endoscopically. The detection rates of AIG were compared between endoscopic diagnosis and pathological diagnosis.
Results:
A total of 10,822 patients underwent EGD during the study period. Finally, 41 patients with AIG were enrolled, leading to an AIG prevalence of 0.38% in this study. As for the clue leading to AIG detection, 31.7% (13/41) were diagnosed through endoscopy (proximal-predominant atrophy), and 68.3% (28/41) were diagnosed pathologically. The AIG detection rate by endoscopists in the posteradication group was significantly lower than in the H. pylori-negative group (p < 0.05).
Conclusion:
Endoscopists frequently overlooked AIG, especially in posteradication cases. Pathological assessment using the updated Sydney system after H. pylori eradication might be a promising strategy to detect AIG better.
Related Concept Videos
01:27Gastritis-I: Introduction and Types
Acute gastritis presents as a sudden inflammation triggered by various stressors to the stomach lining, such as exposure to corrosive agents, local irritants like aspirin and other NSAIDs, alcohol consumption, radiation therapy, physical trauma, severe burns, sepsis,...
01:23Gastritis III: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical manifestations of acute gastritis
The patient with acute gastritis may have a rapid onset of symptoms, such as epigastric pain or discomfort, dyspepsia, anorexia, hiccups, or nausea and vomiting, which can last from a few hours to a few days. Erosive or hemorrhagic gastritis may cause bleeding, which may manifest as blood in vomit or as...
01:17Gastritis-II: Pathophysiology
In acute gastritis, the gastric mucosa becomes swollen and red and undergoes superficial erosion. Superficial ulceration may lead to bleeding.
In chronic gastritis, persistent or repeated insults lead to chronic inflammatory changes and, eventually, thinning or atrophy of the gastric tissue.
Gastritis can stem from various causes, each...
01:28Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
01:30Other Disorders of Digestive System
01:15Myasthenia Gravis: Diagnostic Tests
The edrophonium test is a diagnostic tool for myasthenia gravis. It involves...